Bhattarai v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
| Bharat Bhattarai |
| Jennifer B. Higgins, Christopher Asher Wray, Kevin McAleenan, Emilia Bardini, Ken Cuccinelli, William Barr and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) |
| 4:2019cv05278 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bharat Bhattarai. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019) Modified on 9/12/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Scheduling Order. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Bharat Bhattarai. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Emilia Bardini, William Barr, Ken Cuccinelli, Jennifer B. Higgins, Kevin McAleenan, Christopher Asher Wray, and U.S. Attorney General. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $400, Receipt 34611144291). Summons issued. Filed by Bharat Bhattarai. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
