Enchanted IP LLC v. Tenergy Corporation
| Enchanted IP LLC |
| Tenergy Corporation |
| 4:2019cv05512 |
| September 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Tenaya M Rodewald (Rodewald, Tenaya) (Filed on 10/29/2019) |
Filing 27
ORDER [* AS MODIFIED HEREIN*] by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #25 Stipulation to Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 1/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2020 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #23 Motion to Substitute Attorney as to James Chadwick. Attorney Neil J. McNabnay; Talebi Rodeen; Ricardo J. Bonilla and Michael R. Ellis terminated. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
|
| Filing 25 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED ORDER] to Reschedule Initial Case Management Conference filed by Tenergy Corporation, Enchanted IP LLC. (Chadwick, James) (Filed on 10/25/2019) Modified on 10/28/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Response to #1 Complaint filed by Tenergy Corporation, Enchanted IP LLC. (Chadwick, James) (Filed on 10/25/2019) Modified on 10/28/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 23 MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Substitute Attorney filed by Tenergy Corporation. (Chadwick, James) (Filed on 10/25/2019) Modified on 10/28/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Enchanted IP LLC (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 10/8/2019) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/8/19. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/29/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/6/2019 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey S. White pursuant to General Order No. 67 Patent Pilot Program. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 10/7/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019).
|
| Filing 19 FILED IN ERROR PLEASE IGNORE: ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffery S White United States District Court pursuant to General Order 67 Patent Piolot Program. Judge Phyllis J Hamilton no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/7/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2019: #2 Errata) (as, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/7/2019 (as, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 10/2/19. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019)
|
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tenergy Corporation.. (Rodeen, Talebi) (Filed on 10/1/2019) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Enchanted IP LLC.. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Enchanted IP LLC. Tenergy Corporation served on 9/6/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/30/2019) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/11/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2019) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond re #1 Complaint filed by Tenergy Corporation. (Rodeen, Talebi) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Talebi Rodeen (Rodeen, Talebi) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
| Filing 10 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding:PATENT INFRINGEMENT (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Tenergy Corporation. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
|
Filing 8
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2019 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 9/3/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019)
|
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/17/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2019) |
| Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by Enchanted IP LLC . (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Enchanted IP LLC (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Enchanted IP LLC (Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED; against Tenergy Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13667871.). Filed byEnchanted IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nielsen, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2019) Modified on 9/3/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
