Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. Prizm Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
Defendant: Prizm Labs, Inc. a/k/a Blok Party, Prizm Labs, Inc., Blok Party, 8Hours Foundation and Blok.Party a Delaware corporation doing business as PlayTable
Case Number: 4:2019cv05726
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2020 Filing 36 REPORT on the determination of an action regarding trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Judgment)(bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2020)
November 2, 2020 Filing 35 JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/2/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2020)
October 30, 2020 Filing 34 Stipulation to Final Judgment filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, and Prizm Labs, Inc, Blok Party, and 8Hours Foundation. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Judgment and Permanent Injunction)(Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 10/30/2020) Modified on 11/2/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING without prejudice Dkt. No. #32 stipulation to final judgment and proposed order. Although the parties are free to stipulate to specific facts, the Court does not make factual findings based on those stipulated facts. The parties' proposed consent judgment, therefore, should be revised so that it is clear that the "facts and conclusions" are stipulated by the parties. As an example of this revision, the parties may consult Dkt. No. 24 and Dkt. No. 27, the initial and revised stipulation with proposed judgment and permanent injunction, in Discord Inc. v. Discord Sound, No. 19-5824. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2020)
October 28, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Reminder to Counsel: Judge's name is incorrect on the signature line of the Proposed Order. Counsel need not re-file the document, but shoul d reference the Judges name as Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on future filings. Case division and case location information are incorrect. In the future, please be sure that the case number is correctly reflected on your documents as Oakland Division and the case number should be 4:19-cv-5726 HSG.Re: #32 Stipulation to Final Judgment with Proposed Order filed by 8Hours Foundation, Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Prizm Labs, Inc., Blok.Party, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2020)
October 27, 2020 Filing 32 Stipulation to Final Judgment with Proposed Order filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Prizm Labs, Inc., Blok Party, and 8Hours Foundation. (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 10/27/2020) Modified on 10/28/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
July 31, 2020 #Electronic filing error. REMINDER: Counsel must update personal profile for change of contact information to be in effect. [err102] Re: #31 Notice of Change of Address filed by Prizm Labs, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2020)
July 30, 2020 Filing 31 NOTICE of Change of Address by Lawrence Griffith Townsend (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
June 4, 2020 Filing 30 Certification of ADR Session by Mediator Mark LeHocky: I hereby certify that the parties in this matter held a Mediation session on 5/19/2020. The case did not settle. Further facilitated discussions are expected by 6/12/2020. Mediation process is ongoing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2020)
May 18, 2020 Filing 29 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (with jury demand) FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, UNFAIR COMPETITION AND DILUTION against All Defendants. Filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exs. A-E)(Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 5/18/2020) Modified on 5/19/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
May 5, 2020 Set/Reset Hearing Mediation Hearing set for 5/19/2020 10:00 AM. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2020)
April 29, 2020 Filing 28 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Mark LeHocky as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2020)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/18/2020; Close of Fact Discovery due by 11/13/2020; Opening Reports due by 12/11/2020; Rebuttal Reports due by 1/8/2021; Close of Expert Discovery due by 1/29/2021; Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge S. Gilliam Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for 6/22/2021 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. and Jury Selection \Jury Trial (5-day) set for 7/19/2021 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/20/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
March 19, 2020 Filing 26 JOINT STIPULATION RE (1) PARTIES' ADR PROCESS; AND (2) REVISED CASE SCHEDULE PER THIS COURT'S MARCH 9, 2020 ORDER (DKT. 22) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Prizm Labs, Inc. (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 3/19/2020) Modified on 3/20/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #23 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
March 17, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The correct event is Stipulation and Proposed Order. Please re-file as a stipulation and proposed order as directed in Cour t and via text order, see docket nos. 20 and 22. Re: #24 Stipulation, filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 24 STIPULATION JOINT STIPULATION RE (1) PARTIES' ADR PROCESS; AND (2) REVISED CASE SCHEDULE PER THIS COURT'S MARCH 9, 2020 ORDER (DKT. 22) filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 23 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTING the parties to file by March 16, 2020, the stipulation and proposed order regarding 1) an ADR process; and 2) a revised case schedule, as directed by the Court at the February 18, 2020, case management conference, Dkt. No. 20 . (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2020)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #19 Stipulated Protective Order.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2020)
February 18, 2020 Filing 20 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Further Case Management Conference held on 2/18/2020. FTR Time: 2:12-2:22. Plaintiff Attorney: Mehrnaz Smith. Defendant Attorney: Lawrence Townsend. Parties are directed to meet and confer and e-file stipulations and proposed orders 1) setting a revised case schedule and 2) selecting an ADR process. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/18/2020)
February 18, 2020 Filing 19 [Proposed] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. , and Prizm Labs, Inc. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 2/18/2020) Modified on 2/19/2020 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
February 11, 2020 Filing 18 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC., Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc., and Prizm Labs, Inc. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 2/11/2020) Modified on 2/12/2020 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
December 23, 2019 Filing 17 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by Prizm Labs, Inc.. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/23/2019) Modified on 12/23/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
December 17, 2019 Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Initial Case Management Conference held on 12/17/2019. FTR Time: 2:22-2:31. Plaintiff Attorney: Mehrnaz Smith. Defendant Attorney: Lawrence Townsend. Parties advise the Court that a stipulated protective order will be submitted at the beginning of 2020. Matter is continued to February 18, 2020 at 2 p.m. for a further case management conference. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 12/17/2019)
December 10, 2019 Filing 15 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC., and Prizm Labs, Inc. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 12/10/2019) Modified on 12/11/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
December 10, 2019 #Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: In the future, please be sure that the case number is correctly reflected on your documents as 4:19-cv-05726-HSG. No further action is necessary. Re: #13 Amended Complaint filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., #14 Certificate of Interested Entities, filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2019)
December 9, 2019 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC identifying Corporate Parent Sony Corporation, Corporate Parent Sony Corporation of America for Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC; Corporate Parent Sony Corporation for Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 12/9/2019)
December 9, 2019 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Prizm Labs, Inc.. Filed bySony Interactive Entertainment LLC, Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 12/9/2019)
December 6, 2019 Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Prizm Labs, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Prizm Labs, Inc., Other Affiliate Jimmy Chen, Other Affiliate Blok Party Incorporated, Other Affiliate John Dempsey for Prizm Labs, Inc.. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/6/2019)
December 6, 2019 #Electronic filing error. Filer did not add all interested parties when prompted. Re-file this document in its entirety and when prompted, enter all affiliates or corporate parents .Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #11 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Prizm Labs, Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019)
December 5, 2019 Filing 11 **RE-FILED AT DOCKET NO. #12 ** Certificate of Interested Entities by Prizm Labs, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Prizm Labs, Inc. a/k/a Blok Party for Prizm Labs, Inc.. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 12/5/2019) Modified on 12/9/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
November 26, 2019 Filing 10 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 26, 2019 Filing 9 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
November 18, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND by Prizm Labs, Inc. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 11/18/2019) Modified on 11/19/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
November 5, 2019 #Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: Counsel is instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials HSG immediately after the case number. No further action is necessary. Re: #7 Complaint filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2019)
November 4, 2019 Filing 7 COMPLAINT CORRECTION OF DOCKET #1 against Prizm Labs, Inc.. Filed bySony Interactive Entertainment LLC. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 11/4/2019) Modified on 11/5/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF).
October 23, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. Prizm Labs, Inc. served on 9/30/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
September 13, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Prizm Labs, Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019)
September 13, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 9/12/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, and Dilution (Injunctive Relief Sought) against Prizm Labs, Inc. a/k/a Blok Party ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13697724.). Filed bySony Interactive Entertainment LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 9/12/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. Prizm Labs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prizm Labs, Inc. a/k/a Blok Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prizm Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence Griffith Townsend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blok Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 8Hours Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blok.Party a Delaware corporation doing business as PlayTable
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Represented By: Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith
Represented By: Calla E. Yee
Represented By: Holly Gaudreau
Represented By: Ryan T. Bricker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
Represented By: Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?