Aftechmobile Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Aftechmobile Inc.
Defendant: Salesforce.com, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv05903
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #20 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Jose C. Villarreal.(dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Order by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur.(dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2019)
November 15, 2019 Filing 20 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: Jose C. Villarreal (Filing fee $310, receipt number 0971-13892650) filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Villarreal, Jose) (Filed on 11/15/2019) Modified on 11/18/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
November 14, 2019 Filing 19 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur (Filing fee $310, receipt number 0971-13890340) filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Palaiyanur, Shyamkrishna) (Filed on 11/14/2019) Modified on 11/15/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/14/19. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/13/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2019 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 11/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 13, 2019 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019)
November 12, 2019 Filing 15 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint filed by Salesforce.com, Inc. and Aftechmobile, Inc. (Smith, Ryan) (Filed on 11/12/2019) Modified on 11/12/2019 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
November 12, 2019 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Smith, Ryan) (Filed on 11/12/2019)
November 12, 2019 Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Salesforce.com, Inc... (Smith, Ryan) (Filed on 11/12/2019)
November 12, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan R. Smith (Smith, Ryan) (Filed on 11/12/2019)
November 4, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Aftechmobile Inc... (Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 11/4/2019)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re #9 Order Reassigning Case: Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2019 01:30 PM in Courtroom No. 4, 3rd Floor in Oakland, CA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/4/19. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2019)
October 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for all further proceedings. Judge Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to case. Signed by the Clerk on 10/01/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019)
September 30, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Aftechmobile Inc. (Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 9/30/2019)
September 23, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Salesforce.com, Inc.. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2019)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/12/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor.Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2019)
September 20, 2019 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2019)
September 20, 2019 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Aftechmobile Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Dynamic IP Deals LLC (Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 9/20/2019) Modified on 9/23/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF).
September 20, 2019 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 9/20/2019)
September 20, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 9/20/2019)
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Salesforce.com, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13725067.). Filed byAftechmobile Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Atkins, Todd) (Filed on 9/20/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aftechmobile Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aftechmobile Inc.
Represented By: Todd Christopher Atkins
Represented By: Matthew Michael Wawrzyn
Represented By: Stephen C Jarvis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salesforce.com, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan R. Smith
Represented By: Jose Carlos Villarreal
Represented By: Shyamkrishna Palaiyanur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?