BE Labs, Inc. v. Actiontec Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Defendant: Actiontec Electronics, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv06386
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #35 Stipulation of Dismissal. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2019)
October 22, 2019 Filing 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by BE Labs, Inc. and Actiontec Electronic, Inc. (Corcoran, Peter) (Filed on 10/22/2019) Modified on 10/23/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
October 7, 2019 Filing 34 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/31/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2020 at 1:30 PM. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019)
October 7, 2019 Filing 33 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:19-cv-02636. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
October 4, 2019 Filing 32 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm)
October 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA (DKT. 30) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Transfer to the Northern District of California (Dkt. 30), and finding good cause, HEREBY ORDERS: The Stipulation is APPROVED. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California - San Jose Division. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
September 19, 2019 Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Actiontec Electronics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gray, Justin)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 (IN CHAMBERS) AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. #25 ) by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, continues the Scheduling Conference from September 16, 2019 to October 21, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. The Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report is to be filed no later than October 11, 2019. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. #25 ) by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, continues the Scheduling Conference from September 16, 2019 to October 21, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. The Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report is to be filed no later than October 11, 2019. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 11, 2019 Filing 27 ANSWER to Counterclaim #18 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter)
July 11, 2019 Filing 26 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to BE Labs, Inc. answer now due 7/11/2019, re Counterclaim #18 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc..(Corcoran, Peter)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Hearing: September 16, 2019 at 1:30 pm. Joint Report Due: September 6, 2019. This case has been assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt. This Order applies to all parties in this action, whether or not they are represented by counsel. Counsel, as used in this Order, also refers to parties who are representing themselves. If plaintiff has not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on each defendant, plaintiff shall promptly do so and file proofs of service within three (3) days thereafter. Defendant(s) also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three (3) days thereafter. (shb)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb)
June 17, 2019 Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #22 , Notice of Appearance #20 , Notice of Appearance, #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
June 14, 2019 Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Justin E Gray on behalf of Counter Claimant Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. (Gray, Justin)
June 14, 2019 Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jose L Patino on behalf of Counter Claimant Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. (Attorney Jose L Patino added to party Actiontec Electronics, Inc.(pty:cc), Attorney Jose L Patino added to party Actiontec Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Patino, Jose)
June 14, 2019 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nicola A Pisano on behalf of Counter Claimant Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. (Pisano, Nicola)
June 14, 2019 Filing 19 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Counter Claimant Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. (Pisano, Nicola)
June 14, 2019 Filing 18 COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant BE Labs, Inc.; Jury Demand, filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Actiontec Electronics, Inc..(Pisano, Nicola)
June 14, 2019 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Actiontec Electronics, Inc..(Attorney Nicola A Pisano added to party Actiontec Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Pisano, Nicola)
May 16, 2019 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Actiontec Electronics, Inc. answer now due 6/14/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc..(Attorney Justin E Gray added to party Actiontec Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gray, Justin)
April 29, 2019 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc., upon Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. served on 4/26/2019, answer due 5/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brian Pau, CFO in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 10, 2019 Filing 14 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge. The case number will now read: LA CV19-02636 JAK (ASx). Because all pleadings are routed using the judge's initials, please be sure to use the initials JAK in place of the initials DSF on all future filings. Judge Kronstadt's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Andrea Keifer, can be reached at 213.894.2156.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 10, 2019 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Actiontec Electronics, Inc. (jp)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-02636 JAK (ASx). (esa)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
April 9, 2019 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 9, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by BE Labs, Inc.. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 9, 2019 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc. (Corcoran, Peter)
April 8, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et)
April 8, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. (et)
April 8, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Isaac Rabicoff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
April 8, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
April 8, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
April 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23508724 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff BE Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - 581 Patent, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - 183 Patent, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - 581 chart, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - 183 Patent, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Peter J Corcoran, III added to party BE Labs, Inc.(pty:pla))(Corcoran, Peter)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BE Labs, Inc. v. Actiontec Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BE Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Peter J Corcoran, III
Represented By: Peter Joseph Corcoran, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Actiontec Electronics, Inc.
Represented By: Nicola A Pisano
Represented By: Jose L Patino
Represented By: Justin Edwin Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?