Duncan v. Saul
| Darryl Duncan |
| Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 4:2019cv06458 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew Saul.. (Benavides, Francesco) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Darryl Duncan.. (Morello, Dorian) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/8/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2019) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285, #2 USM-285, #3 USM-285)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2019) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 and #6 AND ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk shall issue summons, and the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments, attachments, scheduling orders and other documents specified by the Clerk, plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon the defendant(s). Motions terminated: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #6 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/22/19. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
|
| Filing 6 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darryl Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Morello, Dorian) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER to Submit Supplemental Information re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darryl Duncan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/16/2019. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019)
|
| Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/23/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darryl Duncan. (Morello, Dorian) (Filed on 10/8/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul. Filed byDarryl Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morello, Dorian) (Filed on 10/8/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
