PUBG Corporation et al v. NetEase, Inc. et al
| PUBG Corporation and PUBG Santa Monica, Inc. |
| NetEase Information Technology Corporation, NetEase, Inc. and Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited |
| 4:2019cv06615 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Contract: Other |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options by Defendants NetEase, Inc., NetEase Information Technology Corporation, and Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited (LaFond, Michael) (Filed on 1/27/2020) |
| Filing 32 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/20/2020 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020) |
Filing 31
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #29 Administrative Motion TO SEAL PORTIONS OF DEFENDANTS NETEASE, INC., NETEASE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, AND HONG KONG NETEASE INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.S JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2020)
|
| Filing 30 Joint MOTION to Dismiss the PUBG Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited, NetEase Information Technology Corporation, NetEase, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 2/28/2020 09:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 2/4/2020. Replies due by 2/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 [Proposed] Order Granting the NetEase Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss)(Stern, Claude) (Filed on 1/21/2020) |
| Filing 29 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of the NetEase Defendants' Joint Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss filed by Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited, NetEase Information Technology Corporation, NetEase, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael LaFond in Support of Motion to Seal, #2 [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Seal, #3 UNREDACTED Joint Motion to Dismiss PUBG's Complaint, #4 REDACTED Joint Motion to Dismiss PUBG's Complaint)(LaFond, Michael) (Filed on 1/21/2020) |
| Filing 28 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 1/21/2020) |
| Filing 27 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2020) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Tomasulo as Counsel for Plaintiffs (Tomasulo, Michael) (Filed on 1/7/2020) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting AS MODIFIED #23 Stipulation CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT.Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2020 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020)
|
| Filing 24 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020) |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER Extending the time for NetEase Information Technology Corp. to Respond to the Complaint, and Requesting an Enlargement of Time to the Initial Case Management Conference filed by Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited, NetEase Information Technology Corporation, NetEase, Inc., PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc. (LaFond, Michael) (Filed on 12/23/2019) Modified on 12/26/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Francis LaFond on behalf of NetEase Inc., NetEase Information Technology Corporation, and Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited (LaFond, Michael) (Filed on 12/23/2019) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Claude M. Stern on behalf of NetEase, Inc., NetEase Information Technology Corporation, and Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited (Stern, Claude) (Filed on 12/23/2019) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal unredacted Complaint for Breach of Contract and Exhibit B thereto. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2019)
|
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc. Certificate of Service of Order Setting Case Management Conference and Standing Orders (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Enzminger, David) (Filed on 11/4/2019) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/4/19. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2020 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2019)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Judge Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by Clerk on 11/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2019)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER RELATING CASE to 18-cv-02010 JSW. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/1/19. Parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge (JSW) immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2019)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc. Certificate of Service of Standing Orders (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/31/2019) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/30/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2019)
|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. Service waived by NetEase, Inc. waiver sent on 10/22/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. Service waived by Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited waiver sent on 10/22/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. Service waived by NetEase Information Technology Corporation waiver sent on 10/22/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2019) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc... (Leiden, Diana) (Filed on 10/29/2019) |
| Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related / and Notice of Related Cases filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. Responses due by 10/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diana Hughes Leiden, #2 Exhibit A to Leiden Decl, #3 Exhibit B to Leiden Decl, #4 Proposed Order)(Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/21/2019) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited, NetEase Information Technology Corporation, NetEase, Inc.. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/30/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
| Filing 4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Complaint for Breach of Contract and Exhibit B thereto filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diana Hughes Leiden, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Redacted Version of Complaint, #4 Redacted Version of Exhibit B to Complaint, #5 Unredacted Version of Complaint, #6 Unredacted Version of Exhibit B to Complaint)(Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/15/2019) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Krafton, Inc. for PUBG Corporation. (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/15/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/15/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT against NetEase, Inc., NetEase Information Technology Corporation, Hong Kong NetEase Interactive Entertainment Limited (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13795077). Filed by PUBG Corporation, PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B (Redacted), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Enzminger, David) (Filed on 10/15/2019) Modified on 10/16/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
