Miranda v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Jason Miranda |
| Ford Motor Company, Chino Hills Ford and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 4:2019cv07760 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt of documents by Santa Clara Superior Court ss to #14 Clerk's Notice. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2020) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Remanding case to Santa Clara Superior Court. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2020) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #12 JOINT STIPULATION REMANDING TO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT filed by Jason Miranda, Chino Hills Ford, Ford Motor Company. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 2/18/2020. ***Civil Case Terminated. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT STIPULATION REMANDING TO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT filed by Chino Hills Ford, Ford Motor Company and Jason Miranda. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harlow, Charles) (Filed on 2/14/2020) Modified on 2/18/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Cinela Aziz (Aziz, Cinela) (Filed on 12/26/2019) |
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/26/2020. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 3/4/2020 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 12/3/19. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
|
| Filing 9 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019) (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Chino Hills Ford, Ford Motor Company.. (Harlow, Charles) (Filed on 12/2/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/19/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/26/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/10/2019. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019) |
| Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint (See Ex D and E of Removal Complaint) by Chino Hills Ford, Ford Motor Company. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) Modified on 11/26/2019 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Chino Hills Ford identifying Other Affiliate WF Irrevocable Trust Chino Hills, Other Affiliate BW Auto Ventures, LLC, Other Affiliate WF Irrevocable Trust BWAV, Other Affiliate Susan B. Walters for Chino Hills Ford. re 1 Notice of Removal,, (Harlow, Charles) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc. for Ford Motor Company. re 1 Notice of Removal,, (Harlow, Charles) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County. Their case number is 19CV357345. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13925266). Filed byFord Motor Company, Chino Hills Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Ntc of Service of Process, #2 Exhibit B-Complaint, #3 Exhibit C-Original Summons, #4 Exhibit D-Answer OBO Ford Motor Company, #5 Exhibit E-Answer OBO Chino Hills Ford, #6 Exhibit F-MSRP Page, #7 Exhibit G-Ford's 2017 10-K Filing Excerpt, #8 Civil Cover Sheet of Charles F. Harlow In Support of Removal, #9 Declaration of Counsel ISO Removal)(Harlow, Charles) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
