SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation et al v. STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership et al
Plaintiff: EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation and SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation
Defendant: STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership and NAHN HO
Case Number: 4:2019cv08240
Filed: December 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2020 Filing 18 Clerk's Notice ENTRY OF DEFAULT : Default is entered as to STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP. on February 13, 2020. (Related documents(s) #17 )(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2020)
February 12, 2020 Filing 17 MOTION for Entry of Default of Defendant Straightouttaink, LP, Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 55(a) filed by EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard H. Doss In Support of Plaintiffs' Request For Entry of Default of Defendant Straightouttaink, LP, Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 55(a))(Doss, Richard) (Filed on 2/12/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation re 6 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #10 Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination, #1 Complaint, #9 Summons Issued, #7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #5 Patent/Trademark Report upon Straightouttaink, LP (Doss, Richard) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
January 31, 2020 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 3/24/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday, 3/30/2020 02:00 PM before Hon. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 1/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020)
January 24, 2020 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020)
January 23, 2020 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation.. (Guledjian, Tigran) (Filed on 1/23/2020)
January 21, 2020 Filing 11 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/4/2020. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2020)
January 2, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/16/2020. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2020)
December 20, 2019 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2019)
December 19, 2019 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to NAHN HO. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 19, 2019 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/17/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2020 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 19, 2019 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/2/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding (cc: form mailed to register). (Doss, Richard) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation (Doss, Richard) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Doss, Richard) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Doss, Richard) (Filed on 12/18/2019)
December 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NAHN HO, STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership. (Filing Fee $400.00 receipt number 0971-13993329) Filed bySEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation, EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation, EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Doss, Richard) (Filed on 12/18/2019) Modified on 12/19/2019 (mbcS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation et al v. STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STRAIGHTOUTTAINK, LP., a California limited partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAHN HO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EPSON AMERICA, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Richard Hull Doss
Represented By: Tigran Guledjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EPSON PORTLAND INC., an Oregon corporation
Represented By: Richard Hull Doss
Represented By: Tigran Guledjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation
Represented By: Richard Hull Doss
Represented By: Tigran Guledjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?