SPRIV, LLC v. Centrify Corporation
Plaintiff: SPRIV, LLC
Defendant: Centrify Corporation
Case Number: 4:2020cv01040
Filed: February 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #20 Stipulation. Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2020)
April 2, 2020 Filing 21 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Centrify Corporation and SPRIV LLC(Kang, Peter) (Filed on 4/2/2020) Modified on 4/3/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
April 2, 2020 Filing 20 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Centrify Corporation and SPRIV, LLC (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Kang, Peter) (Filed on 4/2/2020) Modified on 4/3/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #17 filed by Centrify Parent, LP, Centrify Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 4, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2020)
March 4, 2020 Filing 18 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Centrify Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Centrify Parent, LP for Centrify Corporation. (Kang, Peter) (Filed on 3/4/2020)
March 4, 2020 Filing 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Centrify Corporation and Spriv, LLC. (Kang, Peter) (Filed on 3/4/2020) Modified on 3/5/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
March 4, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter H. Kang of Nathan A. Greenblatt (Kang, Peter) (Filed on 3/4/2020)
March 4, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter H. Kang (Kang, Peter) (Filed on 3/4/2020)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #5 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Seth H. Ostrow.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2020)
February 26, 2020 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 5/5/2020 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/12/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2020)
February 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 2/25/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020)
February 24, 2020 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
February 24, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by SPRIV, LLC.. (Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
February 24, 2020 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SPRIV, LLC (Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
February 12, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Centrify Corporation. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020)
February 12, 2020 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/4/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/11/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/24/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14161340.) filed by SPRIV, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Ostrow, Seth) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by SPRIV, LLC (Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/10/2020)
February 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Centrify Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14160696.). Filed bySPRIV, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pfeiffer, Sarah) (Filed on 2/10/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SPRIV, LLC v. Centrify Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centrify Corporation
Represented By: Nathan A. Greenblatt
Represented By: Peter H. Kang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SPRIV, LLC
Represented By: Seth H. Ostrow
Represented By: Sarah Allison Pfeiffer
Represented By: Mark B. Chassman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?