Anderson et al v. Starbucks Corporation
| Christina Denton, Katherine Butler, James Hancock, Jorge Gonzalez, Jeffrey Bellows, Michael Whiter, Donnie Hyso, Cheyenne Chitry, Elizabeth Anderson, Cassandra Sweeney, Jacqueline Foster, Erik Lorack, Sherri Bradley, Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Amanda Brekke, Omar Garland, Ellesse Anderson, Kevin Steinbeck, Hannah Rothschild, Luke Adelman and Casey McKay |
| Starbucks Corporation |
| 3:2020cv01178 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 58
ORDER. The motion to dismiss and motion to compel arbitration, Dkt. Nos. #48 and #53 , are suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The hearing and further case management conference that were set for September 16, 2021, are vacated pending further order. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/10/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2021)
|
| Filing 57 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Joint Case Management Statement filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 9/9/2021) |
| Filing 56 REPLY (re #53 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Slowik in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Jonathan Slowik - Answer, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Jonathan Slowik - Meet and Confer Communications)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 9/2/2021) |
| Filing 55 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #53 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) filed byLuke Adelman, Elizabeth Anderson, Ellesse Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Sherri Bradley, Amanda Brekke, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Omar Garland, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Casey McKay, Hannah Rothschild, Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Kevin Steinbeck, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Edward J. Wynne in Support of Opposition to Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 8/26/2021) |
| Filing 54 REPLY (re #48 Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint ) filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Slowik in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of of Jonathan Slowik, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of of Jonathan Slowik, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Jonathan Slowik, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Jonathan Slowik, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Jonathan Slowik)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 8/25/2021) |
| Filing 53 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Starbucks Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 8/26/2021. Replies due by 9/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kathryn Daly In Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #8 Exhibit G to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #9 Exhibit H to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #10 Exhibit I to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #11 Exhibit J to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #12 Exhibit K to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #13 Exhibit L to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #14 Exhibit M to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #15 Exhibit N to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #16 Exhibit O to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #17 Exhibit P to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #18 Exhibit Q to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #19 Exhibit R to Declaration of Kathryn Daly, #20 Proposed Order)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 52 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #48 Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint ) filed byLuke Adelman, Elizabeth Anderson, Ellesse Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Sherri Bradley, Amanda Brekke, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Omar Garland, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Casey McKay, Hannah Rothschild, Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Kevin Steinbeck, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Edward J. Wynne)(Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 8/11/2021) |
|
Filing 51
Order by Judge James Donato granting #50 Stipulation. For defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 48, plaintiffs' response is due by August 11, 2021, and defendants' reply is due by August 25, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2021)
|
| Filing 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #48 Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Luke Adelman. (Quiles, Alan) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
|
Filing 49
ORDER. The case management conference that was set for July 22, 2021, is re-set for September 16, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11, San Francisco, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/15/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
|
| Filing 48 Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Starbucks Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 7/28/2021. Replies due by 8/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Slowik in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of of Jonathan Slowik, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of of Jonathan Slowik, #4 Proposed Order)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 7/14/2021) Modified on 7/15/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 47
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/14/2021. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
|
| Filing 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re: July 22, 2021 Case Management Conference filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
|
Filing 45
ORDER by Judge James Donato granting #43 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Alan A. Quiles. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2021)
|
| Filing 44 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and Proposed Order filed by Luke Adelman, Elizabeth Anderson, Ellesse Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Sherri Bradley, Amanda Brekke, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Omar Garland, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Casey McKay, Hannah Rothschild, Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Kevin Steinbeck, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 7/8/2021) |
| Filing 43 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16154486.) filed by Elizabeth Anderson. (Quiles, Alan) (Filed on 7/8/2021) |
| Filing 42 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second against All Defendants. Filed byCassandra Sweeney, Jorge Gonzalez, Jeffrey Bellows, Elizabeth Anderson, Jacqueline Foster, Katherine Butler, Donnie Hyso, Michael Whiter, James Hancock, Cheyenne Chitry, Erik Lorack, Christina Denton, Sherri Bradley, Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Amanda Brekke, Omar Garland, Ellesse Anderson, Kevin Steinbeck, Hannah Rothschild, Luke Adelman, Casey McKay. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 6/30/2021) |
|
Filing 41
ORDER. At the parties' joint request, Dkt. No. #40 , plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint, which should be filed as a separate docket entry. Brekke, Case No. 21-cv-00751, is closed. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/30/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2021)
|
| Filing 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Filing Second Amended Complaint filed by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Attachments: #1 Redlined Second Amended Complaint, #2 Second Amended Complaint)(Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
|
Filing 39
ORDER. A joint case management conference for the Anderson and Brekke cases is set for July 22, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The parties in each respective action will file a joint case management statement in their cases by July 8, 2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/13/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2021)
|
| Filing 38 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Gregory William Knopp (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Knopp, Gregory) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
|
Filing 37
ORDER by Judge James Donato granting #35 Administrative Motion To Relate Case C-21-751-VC. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2021)
|
| Filing 36 Statement of Non-Opposition re #35 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Related document(s) #35 ) (Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 3/19/2021) |
| Filing 35 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed by Elizabeth Anderson. Responses due by 3/19/2021. (Shavitz, Gregg) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
| Filing 34 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge James Donato: Further Case Management Conference held on 2/25/2021. Total Time in Court: 2 minutes. Court Reporter: Belle Ball. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/2/2021) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER. The case management conference set for February 25, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., will be held by Zoom Webinar. Each party should designate a lead counsel to speak at the hearing by emailing the name of their lead counsel to Judge Donato's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Lisa Clark, at jdcrd@cand.uscourts.gov by February 24, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. California time. The names for lead counsel are needed so that Ms. Clark can identify them during the Zoom hearing when the case is called. All lead counsel must call in fifteen minutes before the hearing to test internet, video, and audio capabilities. All counsel, parties, members of the public, and press may join the webinar using the link or information below: https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1617171523?pwd=VWJqM2ZYT1UvNFZ0ZHNZUUhGWTBCZz09 Webinar ID: 161 717 1523 Password: 213597 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16692545252,,1617171523#,,1#,213597# or +16468287666,,1617171523#,,1#,213597# Or Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 254 5252 or +1 646 828 7666PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted remote access to court proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings (including those held by telephone or videoconference). See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. Any recording of a court proceeding held by video or teleconference, including "screen-shots" or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Please see #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom for information on preparing for and participating in a Zoom Webinar. Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/22/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
|
| Filing 32 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER (Joint) filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 2/18/2021) |
|
Filing 31
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 2/25/2021 at 10:00 AM. Case Management Statement due by 2/18/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/5/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER. Starbucks is directed to respond to plaintiffs' requests for production and interrogatories listed in Dkt. No. #23 . Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/5/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021)
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER RE REMAND. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/31/2020. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2020)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter re #27 Notice (Other), Second Notice of Newly Published Opinion (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 12/16/2020) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter of Newly Published Opinion (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
| Filing 26 Discovery Letter Brief in Response to Plaintiffs' Discovery Dispute Letter filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 11/6/2020) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER. Starbucks is directed to respond to plaintiff's discovery dispute letter, Dkt. No. #23 , by November 6, 2020. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/30/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2020)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER. The parties' stipulated protective order is approved, except that in those cases where the stipulated protective order conflicts with the Court's standing orders (e.g., with respect to the filing of discovery motions), the Court's standing orders will control. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/13/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020)
|
| Filing 23 Discovery Letter Brief filed by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 10/12/2020) |
| Filing 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER. The May 21, 2020 case management conference is vacated pending further order. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/12/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2020)
|
| Filing 20 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 4/30/2020) |
| Filing 19 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 4/30/2020) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER VACATING HEARING. The Court finds the #13 motion to be suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). The hearing that was set for April 23, 2020, is vacated, and the Court will issue a decision on the papers. Signed by Judge James Donato on 4/14/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2020)
|
| Filing 17 REPLY (re #13 MOTION to Remand ) In Support of Motion to Remand filed byElizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 4/3/2020) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #13 MOTION to Remand ) filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF SARAH ROGERS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #2 Exhibit A TO DECLARATION OF SARAH ROGERS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #3 Declaration OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #4 Exhibit A TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #5 Exhibit B TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #6 Exhibit C TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #7 Exhibit D TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #8 Exhibit E TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #9 Exhibit F TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #10 Exhibit G TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #11 Exhibit H TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #12 Exhibit I TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #13 Exhibit J TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #14 Exhibit K TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #15 Exhibit L TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #16 Exhibit M TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #17 Exhibit N TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #18 Exhibit O TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #19 Exhibit P TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #20 Exhibit Q TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #21 Exhibit R TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #22 Exhibit S TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND, #23 Exhibit T TO DECLARATION OF CAROLYN B HALL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND)(Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge James Donato granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Gregg I. Shavitz. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge James Donato granting #12 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Camar R. Jones. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Elizabeth Anderson, Jeffrey Bellows, Katherine Butler, Cheyenne Chitry, Christina Denton, Jacqueline Foster, Jorge Gonzalez, James Hancock, Donnie Hyso, Erik Lorack, Cassandra Sweeney, Michael Whiter. Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 3/27/2020. Replies due by 4/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of George R. Nemiroff in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit 1 Plaintiffs' Responses to Special Interrogatories)(Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 3/13/2020) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14268307.) filed by Elizabeth Anderson. (Jones, Camar) (Filed on 3/11/2020) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14268277.) filed by Elizabeth Anderson. (Shavitz, Gregg) (Filed on 3/11/2020) |
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/21/2020 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 5/14/2020. Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/28/2020. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 02/24/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Starbucks Corporation (White, Justin) (Filed on 2/21/2020) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Starbucks Corporation.. (Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 2/20/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 5/ 13/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/20/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2020) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Starbucks Corporation. (White, Justin) (Filed on 2/18/2020) Modified on 2/19/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Starbucks Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Starbucks Corporation for Starbucks Corporation. (White, Justin) (Filed on 2/18/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/3/2020. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020) |
| #1 Answer to Removal Complaint by Starbucks Corporation. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2020) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand by plaintiff) from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG19024868. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14183710). Filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Ex B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Ex C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Ex D to Notice of Removal, #5 Declaration of Carolyn B. Hall, #6 Exhibit Ex A to Carolyn B. Hall Declaration, #7 Exhibit Ex B to Carolyn B. Hall Declaration, #8 Exhibit Ex C to Carolyn B. Hall Declaration, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hall, Carolyn) (Filed on 2/14/2020) Modified on 2/19/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
