Alaniz v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Mariano Alaniz
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Case Number: 4:2020cv01351
Filed: February 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. Responses due by 4/29/2020. Replies due by 5/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rachel A. Straus in Support of Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.'s Motion to Stay or Transfer Proceedings, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #8 Exhibit G to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #9 Exhibit H to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #10 Exhibit I to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #11 Exhibit J to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #12 Exhibit K to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #13 Exhibit L to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #14 Exhibit M to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #15 Exhibit N to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #16 Exhibit O to Declaration of Rachel A. Straus, #17 Proposed Order)(Mallow, Michael) (Filed on 4/15/2020)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS ON TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #12 Stipulation.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2020)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Jon S. Tigar terminating #13 Stipulation. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2020)
April 1, 2020 Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for the Toyota Defendants to Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Mariano Alaniz. (Straus, Rachel) (Filed on 4/1/2020) Modified on 4/2/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
April 1, 2020 Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Service of Process on Toyota Motor Corporation filed by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Mariano Alaniz. (Straus, Rachel) (Filed on 4/1/2020) Modified on 4/2/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
April 1, 2020 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Corporate Parent Toyota Motor Corporation for Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Straus, Rachel) (Filed on 4/1/2020)
April 1, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Aleeza Straus and Michael L. Mallow for Toyota Defendants (Straus, Rachel) (Filed on 4/1/2020)
February 26, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 5/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/19/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2020)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 02/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2020)
February 25, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020)
February 25, 2020 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/27/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/3/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020)
February 25, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2020)
February 24, 2020 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mariano Alaniz.. (Fisher, L) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
February 24, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/9/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
February 21, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fisher, L) (Filed on 2/21/2020)
February 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14206912.). Filed by Mariano Alaniz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fisher, L) (Filed on 2/21/2020) Modified on 2/25/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alaniz v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation
Represented By: Michael Lawrence Mallow
Represented By: Rachel Aleeza Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Michael Lawrence Mallow
Represented By: Rachel Aleeza Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mariano Alaniz
Represented By: L Timothy Fisher
Represented By: Scott A. Bursor
Represented By: L. Timothy Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?