Hopkins v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
| Keith M. Hopkins |
| Alameda County, Dr. Maria Magat and California Forensic Medical Group |
| 4:2020cv01892 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC GRC |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION re #3 Letter filed by Keith M. Hopkins. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supplement: Blank IFP Application)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Keith M. Hopkins. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2020) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Keith Hopkins re Fee Waiver. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2020) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 4/27/2020. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alameda County, California Forensic Medical Group, Maria Magat. Filed by Keith M. Hopkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
