Smith v. Angelica Corporation et al.
| Kenneth C. Smith |
| 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P., Angelica Textile Services Inc. and Angelica Corporation |
| 4:2020cv01968 |
| March 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Phyllis J Hamilton |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE /Submission Regarding Removal by Angelica Corporation, Angelica Textile Services Inc. re #10 Order Reassigning Case,, Case Assigned/Reassigned, #1 Notice of Removal, (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 5/14/2020) Modified on 5/15/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 13
Defendant 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P.'s dba Angelica, Erroneously Sued As Angelica Corporation and Angelica Textile Services, Inc. ANSWER to Amended Complaint byAngelica Corporation, Angelica Textile Services Inc.. (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 5/1/2020)
|
|
Filing 12
First Amended Class Action Complaint with Jury Demand against Kenneth C. Smith. Filed byKenneth C. Smith. (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 4/17/2020) Modified on 4/20/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/9/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/16/2020 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/6/2020. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2020)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by the Clerk on 4/6/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Angelica Corporation, Angelica Textile Services Inc... (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 4/3/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
Defendant 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P.'s dba Angelica, Erroneously Sued As Angelica Corporation and Angelica Textile Services, Inc. ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byAngelica Corporation, Angelica Textile Services Inc.. (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 3/27/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Angelica Corporation, Angelica Textile Services Inc. re #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 3/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 5
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 6/ 16/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2020 01:30 PM. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 3 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/3/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Entities by 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P. identifying Corporate Parent 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P. for 9W Halo Western OpCo L.P.. (Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG20054682. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14300192). Filed by9W Halo Western OpCo L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Christopher S. Alvarez In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration of Mark McNicholas In Support of Defendant's Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court)(Alvarez, Christopher) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
