Brooke v. Danville Sycamore Inn LLC
Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke
Defendant: Danville Sycamore Inn LLC and Danville Sycamore Inn LLC doing business as Best Western Plus Danville Sycamore Inn
Case Number: 4:2020cv01976
Filed: March 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Joseph C Spero
Referring Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 05/05/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2020)
May 4, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2020)
April 24, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 5/1/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2020)
April 22, 2020 Filing 8 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction And Failure to State A Claim ) filed byTheresa Brooke. (Strojnik, P.) (Filed on 4/22/2020)
April 22, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction And Failure to State A Claim filed by Danville Sycamore Inn LLC. Motion Hearing set for 5/29/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 5/6/2020. Replies due by 5/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Roel Almares, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Stillman, Philip) (Filed on 4/22/2020)
April 7, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/21/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2020)
March 23, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Danville Sycamore Inn LLC. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2020)
March 23, 2020 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2020)
March 20, 2020 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/3/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
March 20, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Strojnik, P.) (Filed on 3/20/2020)
March 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Danville Sycamore Inn LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14300941.). Filed byTheresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, P.) (Filed on 3/20/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooke v. Danville Sycamore Inn LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danville Sycamore Inn LLC
Represented By: Philip Harris Stillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danville Sycamore Inn LLC doing business as Best Western Plus Danville Sycamore Inn
Represented By: Philip Harris Stillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke
Represented By: P. Kristofer Strojnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?