Ellis v. Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. et al
| Craig Ellis |
| Clark Construction Group-California, Inc., Shaun Setareh, Ryan H. Crosner, Clark Construction Group, LLC and Clark Construction Group-California, L.P. |
| 4:2020cv02136 |
| March 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for July 7, 2020, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by June 30th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:20-cv-02136-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint byClark Construction Group, LLC, Clark Construction Group-California, Inc., Clark Construction Group-California, L.P.. (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 4/3/2020) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Signed by the Clerk on 4/3/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2020)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2020) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Clark Construction Group, LLC, Clark Construction Group-California, Inc., Clark Construction Group-California, L.P... (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 4/2/2020) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Declaration in Support, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Clark Construction Group, LLC, Clark Construction Group-California, Inc., Clark Construction Group-California, L.P. (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 3/31/2020) Modified on 4/1/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Chaim Shaun Setareh (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/24/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/1/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/13/2020. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2020) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of Ryan H. Crosner in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byClark Construction Group-California, Inc.. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. identifying Clark Construction LLC, for Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 3/27/2020) Modified on 3/30/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. identifying Clark Construction LLC for Clark Construction Group-California, Inc. (Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 3/27/2020) Modified on 3/30/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with jury demand by Plaintiff) from Alameda County Superior Court. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14322056). Filed by Clark Construction Group-California, Inc., Clark Construction Group-California, L.P., Clark Construction Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Exh. A-1, #3 Complaint Exh. A-2, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service Exh. B-1, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service Exh. B-2, #6 Certificate/Proof of Service Exh. B-3)(Crosner, Ryan) (Filed on 3/27/2020) Modified on 3/30/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
