Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Eyeris Entertainment
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Eyeris Entertainment and Eyeris Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2020cv02369
Filed: April 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
June 24, 2020 Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2020)
June 23, 2020 Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
June 19, 2020 Filing 17 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding (cc: form mailed to register). (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2020)
June 19, 2020 Filing 16 Summons Issued as to Eyeris Technologies, Inc.. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2020)
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/28/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 27, 2020 Filing 14 Proposed Summons. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
May 27, 2020 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Eyeris Technologies, Inc.. Filed byCedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
May 27, 2020 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
May 27, 2020 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc... (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 5/27/2020)
May 13, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/27/2020. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2020)
April 30, 2020 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TIME: Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2020 at 11:00 AM is reset to 9:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2020)
April 24, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/7/2020. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2020)
April 9, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Eyeris Entertainment. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2020)
April 9, 2020 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2020 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/22/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 2 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 4/8/2020)
April 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Eyeris Entertainment ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14354249.). Filed byCedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk) (Filed on 4/8/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Eyeris Entertainment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Kirk J. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eyeris Entertainment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eyeris Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?