Salazar v. Rodriguez et al
| Magdaleno Salazar |
| Jose Gonzalez, Deborah Campbell, Reneelou Sobrepena, Felipe Rodriguez, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Carlos Torres, R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, F. Rodriguez, C. Torres and J. Gonzalez |
| 4:2020cv02752 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC CHC |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY and Objections to Defendants Opposition (re #12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel ) filed by Magdaleno Salazar. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2020) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel ) DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (ECF NO. 12) AND PLAINTIFF'S "REPLY TO DEFENDANTS NOTICE/MOTION OF REMOVAL FROM STATE COURT TO FEDERAL COURT ON THE BASIS OF FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION" (ECF NO. 11) filed byD. Campbell, J. Gonzalez, F. Rodriguez, R. Sobrepena, C. Torres. (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 5/28/2020) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Magdaleno Salazar. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2020) |
Filing 10
ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/18/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Magdaleno Salazar. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2020) |
| Filing 11 REPLY re #1 Notice of Removal, by Magdaleno Salazar. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2020) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by D. Campbell, J. Gonzalez, F. Rodriguez, R. Sobrepena, C. Torres.. (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 5/14/2020) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2020) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2020) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, C. Torres, F. Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 4/22/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, C. Torres, F. Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez. (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, C. Torres, F. Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez Defendants' Waiver of Reply Under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g) and DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 MOTION Defendants' Request for Screening Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act filed by R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, C. Torres, F. Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez. Responses due by 5/5/2020. Replies due by 5/12/2020. (Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 ***ENTERED IN ERROR, SEE CORRECT ASSIGNMENT ENTRY BELOW*** Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/30/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL to Federal Court on the Basis of Federal Question Jurisdiction and Demand for Jury Trial from Marin County Superior Court. Their case number is CIV 1902669. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14394872). Filed by R. Sobrepena, D. Campbell, C. Torres, F. Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Padua, Alexander) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect Revision of Civil Cover Sheet used [err201]. Current Revision is JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 07/19). Please complete correct Civil Cover Shee t and e-file an an Amended Civil Cover Sheet only. Event is located at: Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
