Ingrao v. Stoppelman et al
| Nicholas R. Ingrao |
| Charles "Lanny" Baker, Jeremy Stoppelman, Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman and Yelp Inc. |
| 3:2020cv02753 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/6/2020 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Chambers. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/30/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/7/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2020)
|
| Filing 15 Case Reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2020) |
|
Filing 16
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #13 Stipulation to Relate Cases. Case related to 18-cv-400-EMC, Azar v. Yelp.(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2020)
|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE: The parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to relate this case to Azar v. Yelp, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-400-EMC. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12, requests to relate cases must be filed before the judge in the lower-numbered case. Here, Azar is the lower-numbered case and the request to relate should be filed in that case. Docket No. #13 is terminated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2020) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Relate Cases filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao, Yelp Inc., Jeremy Stoppelman, Lanny Banker and Jed Nachman. (Downs, Travis) (Filed on 5/20/2020) Modified on 5/21/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/1/2020 (afmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/22/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao. Service waived by Yelp Inc. waiver sent on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 5/1/2020) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao. Service waived by Jeremy Stoppelman waiver sent on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 5/1/2020) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao. Service waived by Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman waiver sent on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 5/1/2020) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao. Service waived by Charles "Lanny" Baker waiver sent on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 5/1/2020) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/22/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/29/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Charles "Lanny" Baker, Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman, Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp Inc.. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2020) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by Nicholas R. Ingrao . (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/5/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Nicholas R. Ingrao (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Aiding and Abetting Breaches of Fiduciary Duty, Unjust Enrichment and Violation of the Federal Securities Laws with jury demand against Charles "Lanny" Baker, Joseph R. "Jed" Nachman, Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14394805.). Filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/21/2020) Modified on 4/22/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Case been assigned to Judge. However, incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used at case opening of JS 44 07/16. Please complete and refile in its entirety as a sep arate docket entry correct Civil Cover Sheet of JS CAND 44 (rev. 07/19 re: #1 . #1 Complaint, filed by Nicholas R. Ingrao (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
