Wood v. StubHub, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stephanie Wood
Defendant: StubHub, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2020cv04125
Filed: June 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2020 Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Telephonic Case Management Conference has been set for September 29, 2020, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by September 22, 2020. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:20-cv-04125-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.). This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers no longer assigned to case, Signed by Judge the Clerk on 8/12/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2020)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 CORRECTED ORDER RELATING CASE TO 20-cv-2595-HSG. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/12/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2020)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RELATING CASE to 20-cv-2595-HSG. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/12/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2020)
August 4, 2020 Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE VIA ZOOM. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for Monday, 9/28/2020 02:00 PM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers via Zoom platform. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020)
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 07/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2020)
July 23, 2020 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2020)
July 23, 2020 Filing 19 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Stephanie Wood.. (King, Bradley) (Filed on 7/23/2020)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order granting #11 Stipulation Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint entered by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) Modified on 7/13/2020 (ahm, COURT STAFF).
July 9, 2020 Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/23/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2020)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Tiasha Palikovic. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2020)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to J. Burkett McInturff. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2020)
July 8, 2020 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by StubHub, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Pugnacious Endeavors, Inc., Other Affiliate PUG LLC for StubHub, Inc.. (Donovan, William) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
July 8, 2020 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by StubHub, Inc. (Donovan, William) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
July 8, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William Patrick Donovan, Jr (Donovan, William) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
July 8, 2020 Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint filed by Stephanie Wood. (Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
June 30, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE by Stephanie Wood of Pendency of Other Actions (Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 6/30/2020)
June 29, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stephanie Wood. StubHub, Inc. served on 6/24/2020, answer due 7/15/2020. (Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 6/29/2020)
June 29, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Tiasha Palikovic ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14634579.) filed by Stephanie Wood. (Palikovic, Tiasha) (Filed on 6/29/2020)
June 29, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of J. Burkett McInturff ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14634508.) filed by Stephanie Wood. (McInturff, J.) (Filed on 6/29/2020)
June 23, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to StubHub, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
June 23, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
June 23, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/7/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2020)
June 22, 2020 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Stephanie Wood (Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 6/22/2020)
June 22, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 6/22/2020)
June 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against StubHub, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14608969.). Filed byStephanie Wood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolfson, Tina) (Filed on 6/22/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood v. StubHub, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Wood
Represented By: Tina Wolfson
Represented By: Bradley Keith King
Represented By: Theodore Walter Maya
Represented By: J. Burkett McInturff
Represented By: Tiasha Palikovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: StubHub, Inc.
Represented By: William Patrick Donovan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?