Begg v. California Grand Casino
Bruce Begg |
California Grand Casino |
4:2020cv04250 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Jon S Tigar |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 8/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2020) |
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by California Grand Casino.. (Fried, David) (Filed on 8/5/2020) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/5/2020. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020) Modified on 7/22/2020 (dtmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond filed by California Grand Casino and Bruce Begg. (Fried, David) (Filed on 7/22/2020) Modified on 7/23/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bruce Begg. California Grand Casino served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (Zelman, Yitzchak) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to California Grand Casino. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2020) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Zelman, Yitzchak) (Filed on 6/30/2020) |
Filing 5 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #3 Motion for Pro Hac Vice by Yitzchak Zelman.(dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2020) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2020) |
Filing 3 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice re: Yitzchak Zelman ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-14632072.) filed by Bruce Begg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NJ Cert of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit NY Cert of Good Standing)(Zelman, Yitzchak) (Filed on 6/29/2020) Modified on 6/30/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/10/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2020) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against California Grand Casino (No Process)( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14624705.). Filed byBruce Begg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stieglitz, Jonathan) (Filed on 6/25/2020) Modified on 6/29/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/29/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Begg v. California Grand Casino | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bruce Begg | |
Represented By: | Jonathan A Stieglitz |
Represented By: | Yitzchak Zelman |
Represented By: | Jonathan A. Stieglitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: California Grand Casino | |
Represented By: | David Michael Fried |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.