Leong v. Havens
| Arnold Leong |
| Warren Havens |
| Susan L. Uecker |
| 4:2020cv05236 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 64 Ex Parte Application re #61 Order to Show Cause, (this has a request to the court to extend the time for response to the OSC, and also has an administrative motion for same purpose) filed by Warren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/25/2020) |
| Filing 63 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #61 Order to Show Cause, (this also has a Request to the Court for same purpose, requesting response on Sept. 28) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/28/2020. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/25/2020) |
| Filing 62 USCA Case Number 20-16844 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for #58 Notice of Appeal, filed by Warren Havens. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020) |
Filing 61
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED. Show Cause Response due by 9/30/2020. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 23, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 60 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #53 Emergency ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION (emergency basis, for required disclosures [rule 3-15] & required juris. statements [LR 3-5]- link to: failures of and in past filings) , #54 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Strike Pleading re #52 Joinder (which is principally an unauthorized improper motion, amendment, etc interposed for improper reasons) ) filed bySusan L. Uecker. (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 9/22/2020) |
| Filing 59 Request for payment of docket fee to appellant (cc to USCA). (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2020) |
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Warren Havens. Appeal of Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11, #55 (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (certain IFP relief to be filed with 9th Cir, before or if needed with fee payment: 9th Cir. filing clerk not available yet for instructions by phone or email) (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/21/2020) |
| Filing 57 NOTICE by Warren Havens (amended-errata version of. notices and requests re 9-23-20 intended filings, under new facts, communicated reports, and filings, relevant to jurisdiction, remand, removed action, etc.) (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/21/2020) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE by Warren Havens (notices and requests re, 9-23-20 intended filings, under new facts, communicated reports, and filings, relevant to jurisdiction, remand, removed action, etc.) (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/21/2020) |
|
Filing 55
Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying #47 Administrative Motion to Proceed Informa Pauperis on Appeal.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 54 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Strike Pleading re #52 Joinder (which is principally an unauthorized improper motion, amendment, etc interposed for improper reasons) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/21/2020. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/17/2020) |
| Filing 53 Emergency ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION (emergency basis, for required disclosures [rule 3-15] & required juris. statements [LR 3-5]- link to: failures of and in past filings) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/21/2020. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/17/2020) |
| Filing 52 Joinder re #9 MOTION to Remand by Susan L. Uecker. (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 9/17/2020) |
| Filing 51 USCA Case Number 20-16787 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for #50 Notice of Appeal,, filed by Warren Havens. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2020) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Warren Havens. Appeal of Order,,, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings,,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, #41 , Order Relating Case, #12 , Order Reassigning Case,,, Case Assigned/Reassigned,, #13 , Order on Motion to Remand,,, Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, #18 , Order,, 43 (IFP Request was previously e-filed with the Court). (NOA interlocutory orders and related) (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 49 NOTICE by Warren Havens re #44 Opposition/Response to Motion, #45 Opposition/Response to Motion, #9 MOTION to Remand , #48 Reply to Opposition/Response, #46 Letter (notice of new events, and objection to failure to meet-confer) (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 48 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF REMAND (re #9 MOTION to Remand ) filed by Arnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 9/15/2020) Modified on 9/16/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 47 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Civ L.R. 3.10 Commentary (in forma pauperis, and related) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/21/2020. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
| Filing 46 Letter (Request to accept and related). (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
| Filing 45 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Remand ) (ver. 2, see p.1 reasons) filed byWarren Havens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
| Filing 44 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Remand ) filed byWarren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
|
Filing 43
ORDER In light of the Labor Day holiday, Defendant Havenss response to Plaintiffs motion to remand is now due September 8, 2020; Plaintiff Leongs reply is now due September 15, 2020; and Defendant Havenss surreply is now due September 21. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 4, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jstlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 42 RESPONSE re #41 Order,,, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings,,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, (request to reset deadlines, since Sept 7 is Labor Day, and opp. lawyers would not stipulate) by Warren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/4/2020) |
|
Filing 41
ORDER ADDRESSING MOTIONS AND BRIEFING DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO REMAND re #9 MOTION to Remand filed by Arnold Leong, Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Remand . Responses due by 9/7/2020. Replies due by 9/14/2020. Objections due by 9/18/2020. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 3, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 40 RESPONSE re #18 Order on Motion to Remand,,, Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, by Warren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
| Filing 39 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Warren Havens. Amendment to #33 First Ex Parte Application re #23 Request for Judicial Notice, #29 Opposition/Response to Motion, #25 MOTION Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Or . (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
| Filing 38 RESPONSE re #36 Opposition/Response to Motion, #35 Opposition/Response to Motion, #37 Opposition/Response to Motion,,, #34 Opposition/Response to Motion, by Warren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 9/2/2020) |
| Filing 37 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #33 First Ex Parte Application re #23 Request for Judicial Notice, #29 Opposition/Response to Motion, #25 MOTION Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Or, #30 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #27 Letter (Prompt Decision Requested), #32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION , #31 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief < ) filed bySusan L. Uecker. (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 9/1/2020) |
| Filing 36 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #30 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #27 Letter (Prompt Decision Requested) ) filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 9/1/2020) |
| Filing 35 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ) filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 9/1/2020) |
| Filing 34 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #31 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief < ) filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 9/1/2020) |
| Filing 33 First Ex Parte Application re #23 Request for Judicial Notice, #29 Opposition/Response to Motion, #25 MOTION Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 USC section 1651 , #30 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #27 Letter (Prompt Decision Requested), #26 Joinder, #28 Letter, #32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION , #22 Notice (Other), #9 MOTION to Remand , #18 Order on Motion to Remand,,, Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, #27 Letter, #31 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief < (Decision Requested by 3pm 9-2-20) filed by Warren Havens. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/31/2020) |
| Filing 32 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/28/2020) |
| Filing 31 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief , #23 Request for Judicial Notice, #25 MOTION Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 USC section 1651 , #26 Joinder, #28 Letter, #17 Opposition/Response to Motion, #22 Notice (Other), #9 MOTION to Remand , #18 Order on Motion to Remand,,, Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, #21 MOTION to Remand Receiver's Joinder in Remand Motion (ECF No. 9) (Prompt Decision Requested) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/28/2020) |
| Filing 30 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION re #1 Notice of Removal, #27 Letter (Prompt Decision Requested) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 9/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/28/2020) |
| Filing 29 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 First MOTION RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH US TAX COURT CASE DETERMINATIONS, THAT ALSO UNDERLIES ABILITY & RIGHT OF RESPONDENT TO HIRE COUNSEL NEEDED IN THIS CASE re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOT ) filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/27/2020) |
| Filing 28 Letter . (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
| Filing 27 Letter . (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/24/2020) |
| Filing 26 Joinder re #25 MOTION Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 USC section 1651 by Arnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/20/2020) |
| Filing 25 Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and For A Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 USC section 1651 filed by Susan L. Uecker. Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 9/3/2020. Replies due by 9/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration David A. Degroot, #2 Exhibit 1-13, #3 Exhibit 14-27, #4 Proposed Order)(DeGroot, David) (Filed on 8/20/2020) Modified on 8/21/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Responses due by 9/2/2020. Replies due by 9/9/2020. Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Jon S. Tigar. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] Notice of Withdrawal of Motion. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #20 Response ( Non Motion ), filed by Warren Havens (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] the correct event can be found at: Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Joinder. Corrected by Clerk 's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #21 MOTION to Remand Receiver's Joinder in Remand Motion (ECF No. 9) filed by Susan L. Uecker (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The correct event is Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #22 Notice (Other), filed by S usan L. Uecker (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| Filing 24 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Consider Whether Cases Should be Relate; Declaration Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11(a) filed by Arnold Leong. Responses due by 8/24/2020. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| Filing 23 Request for Judicial Notice re #22 Notice (Other), in Support of Receiver's Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and for a Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1651 filed bySusan L. Uecker. (Related document(s) #22 ) (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE by Susan L. Uecker Receiver's Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order Declaring Defendant Warren Havens a Vexatious Litigant and for a Prefiling Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1651 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David A. Degroot, #2 Exhibit 1-13, #3 Exhibit 14-27, #4 Proposed Order)(DeGroot, David) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
| Filing 21 Receiver's Joinder in Remand Motion (ECF No. 9) filed by Susan L. Uecker. (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 8/19/2020) Modified on 8/20/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 20 REQUEST TO WITHDRAW OR DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE re #19 Opposition/Response to Motion, #15 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR A GUARDIAN AD LITEM (GAL) BY COUNSEL TO THE GAL TO REPRESENT THE PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF ARNOLD LEONG, ALLEGED BY COUNSEL ACTING IN HIS NAME TO BE LEGALLY INCAPACITATED re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION by Warren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/19/2020) Modified on 8/20/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR A GUARDIAN AD LITEM (GAL) BY COUNSEL TO THE GAL TO REPRESENT THE PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF ARNOLD LEONG, ALLEGED BY COUNSEL ACTING IN HIS NAME TO BE LEGALLY INCAPACITATED re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ) filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/18/2020) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF INFORMATION REGARDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying #10 Administrative Motion to Shorten Time. Responses due by 9/2/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/9/2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 8/18/2020 (mllS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief , #9 MOTION to Remand ) filed byWarren Havens. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
| Filing 16 Brief re: Docket 11 PLAINTIFF ARNOLD LEONGS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED; DECLARATION OF ATTORNEY RICHARD OSMAN IN SUPPORT filed byArnold Leong. (Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
| Filing 15 First ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR A GUARDIAN AD LITEM (GAL) BY COUNSEL TO THE GAL TO REPRESENT THE PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF ARNOLD LEONG, ALLEGED BY COUNSEL ACTING IN HIS NAME TO BE LEGALLY INCAPACITATED re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief , #2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #14 First MOTION RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH US TAX COURT CASE DETERMINATIONS, THAT ALSO UNDERLIES ABILITY & RIGHT OF RESPONDENT TO HIRE COUNSEL NEEDED IN THIS CASE re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOT, #12 Order Relating Case, #13 Order Reassigning Case,,, Case Assigned/Reassigned,, #9 MOTION to Remand [This Admin. Motion] filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 8/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/14/2020) |
| Filing 14 First MOTION RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH US TAX COURT CASE DETERMINATIONS, THAT ALSO UNDERLIES ABILITY & RIGHT OF RESPONDENT TO HIRE COUNSEL NEEDED IN THIS CASE re #10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief , #1 Notice of Removal, #9 MOTION to Remand filed by Warren Havens. Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 8/27/2020. Replies due by 9/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 8/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RELATING CASE 20-cv-05236-KAW to18-cv-05751-JST. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 11, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 11 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION copy of motion to relate under N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3-12, 7-11 re #1 Notice of Removal, (copy in this case) filed by Warren Havens. Responses due by 8/17/2020. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 10 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Requesting An Order to Show Cause Why The Case Should Not be Remanded or, Alternatively, to Shorten Time on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, As Well As For Other Equitable Relief filed by Arnold Leong. Responses due by 8/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand filed by Arnold Leong. Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 8/26/2020. Replies due by 9/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard W. Osman in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Remand)(Osman, Richard) (Filed on 8/12/2020) Modified on 8/18/2020 (mllS, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Document filed in wrong case. PDF references incorrect case number. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #8 Amended Document filed by Warren Havens ( bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2020) |
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT FILED IN WRONG CASE*** AMENDED DOCUMENT by Warren Havens. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, (in 4-20-cv-05234-KAW). (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/7/2020) Modified on 8/10/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Warren Havens.. (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
| Filing 5 ERRATA VERSION RE #4 INITIAL RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO RELATE CASE (4:18-cv-05751 JST) AND OBJECTION TO SURPRISE FILING by Warren Havens (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/5/2020) Modified on 8/5/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 INITIAL RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO RELATE CASE (4:18-cv-05751 JST) and OBJECTION TO SURPRISE FILING by Warren Havens (Havens, Warren) (Filed on 8/4/2020) Modified on 8/5/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Susan L. Uecker Notice of Non-Consent to Removal (DeGroot, David) (Filed on 8/4/2020) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2020 01:30 PM. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2020) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL; No Process, from Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is 2002-070640. (Filing Fee: Paid. Receipt No. 44611016919). Filed by Warren Havens. Consent/Declination due by 8/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Filing Fee Receipt)(jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
