Nichols v. County of Lake et al
| Pamela Nichols |
| Carol Huchingson and County of Lake |
| 4:2020cv05259 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/13/20. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/6/2020 11:00 AM. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020)
|
| Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Pamela Nichols.. (Bonner, Charles) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/28/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/4/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/14/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) (no process) against Carol Huchingson, County of Lake (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14758673). Filed by Pamela Nichols. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bonner, Charles) (Filed on 7/31/2020) Modified on 8/3/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
