PG&E Corporation et al v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..
Plaintiff: JH Kelly, LLC
Defendant: AECOM Technical Services, Inc..
Debtor In Possession: PG&E Corporation
Case Number: 4:2020cv05381
Filed: August 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawal
Cause of Action: 11 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING (Dkt. No. #3 ) the parties' administrative motion to expedite the hearing date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)
September 24, 2020 #Electronic filing error. REMINDER to Counsel: that for future motion filings, the proposed order should be filed as an attachment to the motion and not as a separate f iling. Re: #4 Proposed Order filed by JH Kelly, LLC (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)
September 23, 2020 Set Hearing Re Docket No. #1 , See Docket No. #2 : Motion Hearing set for 12/10/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2020)
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 Proposed Order re #2 Notice (Other), #3 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Expedite Hearing Date re #2 Notice (Other) by JH Kelly, LLC. (Nicholas, Mario) (Filed on 9/23/2020)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Expedite Hearing Date re #2 Notice (Other) filed by JH Kelly, LLC and AECOM Technical Services, Inc.. Responses due by 9/28/2020. (Nicholas, Mario) (Filed on 9/23/2020) Modified on 9/24/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE by JH Kelly, LLC and AECOM Technical Services, Inc. re #1 Withdrawal of Reference (Nicholas, Mario) (Filed on 9/23/2020) Modified on 9/24/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
August 4, 2020 Filing 1 Withdrawal of Bankruptcy Reference Upon Order of the Court Bankruptcy Court case number 19-30088 (DM); Adversary Case Nos. 20-3019(DM); 19-3008(DM).. Filed by JH Kelly, LLC. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PG&E Corporation et al v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AECOM Technical Services, Inc..
Represented By: Marsha Ann Houston
Represented By: Luke Nicholas Eaton
Represented By: Christopher Orlando Rivas
Represented By: Marion Teresa Hack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JH Kelly, LLC
Represented By: David B. Levant
Represented By: Mario R Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor in possession: PG&E Corporation
Represented By: Theodore Tselerodes
Represented By: Peter J. Benvenutti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?