Onscreen Dynamics, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Onscreen Dynamics, LLC
Defendant: Asustek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International
Case Number: 4:2020cv05553
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2020 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2020)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 8/25/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2020)
August 24, 2020 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
August 24, 2020 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Onscreen Dynamics, LLC.. (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/24/2020)
August 14, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Onscreen Dynamics, LLC (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/14/2020)
August 11, 2020 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Defendant ASUS Computer International. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020)
August 11, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020)
August 11, 2020 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/2/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/9/2020 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Onscreen Dynamics, LLC (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Patent Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/10/2020)
August 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-14796384). Filed by Onscreen Dynamics, LLC. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Wiener, Seth) (Filed on 8/10/2020) Modified on 8/11/2020 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Onscreen Dynamics, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Asustek Computer Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASUS Computer International
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Onscreen Dynamics, LLC
Represented By: Seth Wesley Wiener
Represented By: Timothy Devlin
Represented By: Cory Edwards
Represented By: Derek Dahlgren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?