Coleman et al v. Ortiz et al
Wendell Coleman and Estelle Coleman |
Judge Solga, Napa Superior Court, Mark Boessenecker and Elia Ortiz |
4:2020cv05798 |
August 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Joseph C Spero |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #6 Report and Recommendations, ORDER REMANDING CASE to Napa County Superior Court. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/9/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 08/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/24/2020. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re sua sponte remand of action to Napa County Superior Court. This case shall be reassigned to a district judge. Objections due within fourteen days of service of this Order. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on August 21, 2020. (jcslc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 9/4/2020. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 Letter from Wendell Coleman. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
Filing 3 Letter from Wendell Coleman re Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/6/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/13/2020 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. No process. Filing fee $ 400, 44611016934. Filed by Wendell Coleman. Consent/Declination due by 8/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.