Dawson v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Courtney Dawson |
Uber Technologies Inc. |
4:2020cv06736 |
September 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Donna M Ryu |
American with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Courtney Dawson.. (Cheng, David) (Filed on 10/30/2020) |
Filing 12 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/12/2020. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu Granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Re: David Cheng (Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-15124891) filed by Courtney Dawson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing NDGA, #2 Exhibit Letter of Good Standing GA)(Cheng, David) (Filed on 10/28/2020) Modified on 10/28/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/28/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/23/20 20. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/30/2020 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2020) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2020) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/13/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2020) |
Filing 5 ERRATA - CORRECTION OF DOCKET #1 Complaint (with jury demand) (Corrected Caption) by Courtney Dawson. (Makman, David) (Filed on 9/27/2020) Modified on 9/28/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Dawson Courtney (Makman, David) (Filed on 9/26/2020) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Makman, David) (Filed on 9/26/2020) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Dawson Courtney . (Makman, David) (Filed on 9/26/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Uber Technologies Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14991609). Filed by Courtney Dawson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Makman, David) (Filed on 9/26/2020) Modified on 9/28/2020 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dawson v. Uber Technologies Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Courtney Dawson | |
Represented By: | David Alan Makman |
Represented By: | David Gan-wing Cheng |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.