Doe v. Google LLC et al
John Doe |
Codigo Rojo Noticias, Reforma, Blogger.com, Noticias PV Nayarit, El Manana, El Siglo De Torreon, Reporte Nivel Uno, Infobae, Noventa Grados, El Norte, vanguardia, Omnia, Valor Tamaulipeco, Google LLC and Borderland Beat |
4:2020cv06822 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendants Google LLC and Blogger.com Only by John Doe (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/22/2020) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Blogger.com, Borderland Beat, Codigo Rojo Noticias, El Manana, El Norte, El Siglo De Torreon, Google LLC, Infobae, Noticias PV Nayarit, Noventa Grados, Omnia, Reforma, Reporte Nivel Uno, Valor Tamaulipeco, vanguardia. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2020) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/6/2020) |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2021 01:30 PM. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020) |
#Electronic filing error.[err201] Only ONE summons will be issued. Please list all defendants on ONE summons. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons, filed by John Doe (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020) |
Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed under a Pseudonym.(dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Doe.. (Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/19/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2020) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Under A Pseudonym filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/3/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons)(Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15005002.). Filed byJohn Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mendelman, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
#Electronic filing error. A motion and proposed order to proceed as Doe must be filed before the case will be assigned. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office unti l such motion and proposed order is received. Re: #1 Complaint filed by John Doe (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.