KHN Solutions Inc. v. Rofeer-US
Plaintiff: KHN Solutions Inc.
Defendant: Rofeer-US doing business as SHEN ZHEN MENG QIAN HUA KAI MAOYI YOU XIAN GONG SI
Case Number: 4:2020cv07414
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by KHN Solutions Inc... (Fulmer, Pamela) (Filed on 11/5/2020)
October 23, 2020 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/19/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/26/2021 01:30 PM. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rofeer-US. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020)
October 23, 2020 #Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is required to file an A0120 form. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by KHN Solutions Inc. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020) Modified on 10/23/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
October 22, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/5/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2020)
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by KHN Solutions Inc. (Fulmer, Pamela) (Filed on 10/22/2020)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fulmer, Pamela) (Filed on 10/22/2020)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand For False Advertising Under Lanham Act 43(A); False Advertising Under California Business & Professions Code 17500, Et Seq.; Unfair Competition Under California Business & Professions Code 17200, Et Seq. against Rofeer-US ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15099605.). Filed byKHN Solutions Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fulmer, Pamela) (Filed on 10/22/2020) Modified on 10/23/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KHN Solutions Inc. v. Rofeer-US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KHN Solutions Inc.
Represented By: Pamela K. Fulmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rofeer-US doing business as SHEN ZHEN MENG QIAN HUA KAI MAOYI YOU XIAN GONG SI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?