Geisler et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Maria Garcia and Francisca Geisler
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 4:2020cv08163
Filed: November 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/9/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2021)
March 8, 2021 Filing 25 Joint Notice of Settlement by Francisca Geisler, Ford Motor Company and Maria Garcia. (Barry, David) (Filed on 3/8/2021) Modified on 3/9/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
March 2, 2021 Filing 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 3/2/2021. Total Time in Court: 8 minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: David Barry. Defendant Attorney: Trina Clayton. Counsel for plaintiff advises the Court that he can have a motion to remand filed within 7-10 days. Parties are directed to meet and confer and e-file a stipulation and proposed order setting a case schedule within one week from today (March 9th). The stipulation should include March 7, 2022 for a 3-day- jury trial. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/2/2021)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DISCHARGING Dkt. No. 19 the Order to Show Cause, in light of Dkt. No. #22 counsel's explanation that his failure to appear was the inadvertent result of a scheduling error that has now been resolved and thus will not reoccur. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2021)
February 25, 2021 Filing 22 Statement of David N. Barry in Response to Order to Show Cause regarding Sanctions for Failure to Appear at Initial Case Management Conference by Francisca Geisler. (Barry, David) (Filed on 2/25/2021)
February 24, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Trina Marie Clayton (Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 23, 2021 Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 2/23/2021. Total Time in Court: 3 Minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: No Appearance. Defendant Attorney: Trina Clayton. At 2:23 p.m., the case is called and counsel for plaintiff is not present for the telephonic hearing. The Court states that an order to show cause will be issued based on counsels failure to appear. Case is continued to March 2, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. for initial case management conference.The March 2nd proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/23/2021)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTING Plaintiffs' counsel TO SHOW CAUSE why he should not be sanctioned for failing to attend the initial case management conference held on February 23, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiffs' counsel shall file a statement of two pages or less by February 25, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2021)
February 23, 2021 Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. 13 . Notice is hereby given that the case management conference previously set for today, February 23rd, will be held telephonically. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2021)
February 16, 2021 Filing 17 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Ford Motor Company, Maria Garcia, and Francisca Geisler. (Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 2/16/2021) Modified on 2/17/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
February 5, 2021 Filing 16 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Maclear, Amy) (Filed on 2/5/2021)
December 3, 2020 Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Maria Garcia, Francisca Geisler.. (Barry, David) (Filed on 12/3/2020)
November 23, 2020 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company of Standing Orders (Colletti, Nicholas) (Filed on 11/23/2020)
November 20, 2020 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for February 23, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by February 16th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:20-cv-08163-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Filing 12 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Filing 11 Case REASSIGN to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no assigned to the case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020) (bwS, COURT STAFF).
November 20, 2020 Filing 10 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Pollard Vilchez (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Colletti, Nicholas) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 19, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/3/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Ryan Colletti (Colletti, Nicholas) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Patricia Maclear, Esq (Maclear, Amy) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Black Rock, Inc. for Ford Motor Company. (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 11/19/2020)
November 19, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Monterey County Superior Court. Their case number is 20CV002400. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-15216202). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Spencer P. Hugret, #2 Declaration of Nicholas R. Colletti, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B - Redacted, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 11/19/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Geisler et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Katherine Pollard Vilchez
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Nicholas Ryan Colletti
Represented By: Amy Patricia Maclear, Esq.
Represented By: Nicholas R Colletti
Represented By: Trina Marie Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Garcia
Represented By: David Neal Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisca Geisler
Represented By: David Neal Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?