Abhyanker v. Airbnb, Inc.
Raj Abhyanker |
Mr Airbnb, Inc. |
4:2020cv08248 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Jon S Tigar |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER VACATING HEARING re #20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Airbnb, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 19, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) |
Filing 26 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #23 Motion to Continue /Request To Modify Opposition And Initial Case Management Conference Dates.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2021) |
Filing 25 REPLY (re #20 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byAirbnb, Inc.. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 1/11/2021) |
Filing 24 Nonopposition to Plaintiff Raj Abhyankers Request to Modify Opposition and Initial Case Management Conference Dates and [Proposed] Order(re #23 MOTION to Continue ) filed byAirbnb, Inc.. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 1/11/2021) Modified on 1/11/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The correct event is Motion to Continue. The correct event can be found at: Civil Events > Motions and Related Filings > Motions - General > Continue. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #23 Supplemental Brief, filed by Raj Abhyanker (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2021) |
Filing 23 Plaintiff Raj Abhyankers MOTION to Continue /Request To Modify Opposition And Initial Case Management Conference Dates re #22 MOTION for Protective Order and ESI Stipulation, #9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, filed byRaj Abhyanker. (Related document(s) #22 , #9 ) (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 1/8/2021) Modified on 1/11/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 22 MOTION for Protective Order and ESI Stipulation filed by Raj Abhyanker. Motion Hearing set for 2/10/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 1/19/2021. Replies due by 1/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Raj Abhyanker, #2 Exhibit A thru C, #3 Proposed Order)(Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 1/5/2021) |
Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #20 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byRaj Abhyanker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Raj Abhyanker ISO Opp. to MTD, #2 Exhibit 1-12)(Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 1/4/2021) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Airbnb, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/27/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 1/4/2021. Replies due by 1/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 12/21/2020) |
Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Airbnb, Inc. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 12/21/2020) |
Filing 18 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Samantha Maxfield Lerner.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Janelle A. LiAPing for Defendant Airbnb, Inc. (LiAPing, Janelle) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 16 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15289618.) filed by Airbnb, Inc.. (Lerner, Samantha) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raj Abhyanker. Airbnb, Inc. served on 11/25/2020, answer due 12/16/2020. (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 14 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Motions terminated: #12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Complaint, for Extending Time for Defendant Airbnb to Respond to Complaint filed by Airbnb, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 4, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2020) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeanifer Ellen Parsigian (Parsigian, Jeanifer) (Filed on 12/4/2020) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Time for Defendant Airbnb to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint, filed by Airbnb, Inc. and Raj Abhyanker. (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 12/4/2020) Modified on 12/7/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Vidal (Vidal, Katherine) (Filed on 12/4/2020) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Airbnb, Inc.. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/16/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 2/16/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet by Raj Abhyanker Revised Civil Cover page - October 2020 revision. (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Filing 5 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Raj Abhyanker.. (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding U.S. Patent 8,874,489 (cc: form mailed to register). (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15229110.). Filed byRaj Abhyanker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 through 110, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Abhyanker, Raj) (Filed on 11/23/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Abhyanker v. Airbnb, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Raj Abhyanker | |
Represented By: | Raj Vasant Abhyanker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mr Airbnb, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Katherine Vidal |
Represented By: | Janelle A. LiAPing |
Represented By: | Samantha Maxfield Lerner |
Represented By: | Jeanifer Ellen Parsigian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.