Sonohm Licensing LLC v. Ampro Adlink Technology Inc.
Sonohm Licensing LLC |
Ampro Adlink Technology Inc. |
4:2020cv08367 |
November 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING #17 STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TOCIVIL L.R. 6-2 FOR ORDER SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANT AMPRO ADLINK TECHNOLOGY, INC..(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2021) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER , Extending Time to Respond, filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 1/21/2021) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Bennett, David. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2020) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for March 9, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Case Management Statement due by March 2nd. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:20-cv-08367-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2020) |
Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sonohm Licensing LLC.. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 12/11/2020) |
Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings RE #12 Notice of Pendency of Other Actions Involving Same Patent. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2020) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Sonohm Licensing LLC (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 12/11/2020) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Ampro Adlink Technology Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
Filing 10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/24/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/3/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
Filing 9 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/24/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
Filing 8 Civil Cover Sheet by Sonohm Licensing LLC AMENDED. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 12/10/2020) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Please use our updated Civil Cover Sheet which can be downloaded at www.cand.uscourts.gov and case will be assigned. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2020) |
Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-15253531.) filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Admission - Bennett)(Bennett, David) (Filed on 11/30/2020) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 11/27/2020) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sonohm Licensing LLC (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 11/27/2020) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Sonohm Licensing LLC . (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 11/27/2020) |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding PATENT INFRINGEMENT (cc: form mailed to register). (Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 11/27/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Ampro Adlink Technology Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15248321.). Filed bySonohm Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Ritcheson, Steven) (Filed on 11/27/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sonohm Licensing LLC v. Ampro Adlink Technology Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sonohm Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Steven Whitefield Ritcheson |
Represented By: | David Randolph Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ampro Adlink Technology Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.