Johnson v. CVS Health Corporation
Scott Johnson |
CVS Health Corporation |
4:2020cv08612 |
December 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Jeffrey S White |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #14 Stipulation to Extend Site Inspection Deadline AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2021) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert P. Doyle, PhD (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Doyle, Robert) (Filed on 1/21/2021) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Site Inspection Deadline filed by Scott Johnson, CVS Health Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doyle, Robert) (Filed on 1/21/2021) Modified on 1/22/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Johnson. CVS Health Corporation served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 1/12/2021) |
Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by CVS Health Corporation (Platt, Henry) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extending Time To Respond To #1 Complaint filed by CVS Health Corporation, Scott Johnson. (Platt, Henry) (Filed on 1/6/2021) Modified on 1/6/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 9 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Scott Johnson.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to CVS Health Corporation. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2020) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2020) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/21/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2020) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/6/2020) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Scott Johnson re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/6/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15280268.). Filed byScott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 12/6/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. CVS Health Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CVS Health Corporation | |
Represented By: | Henry Adam Platt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson | |
Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
Represented By: | Robert P. Doyle, Ph.D. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.