IN RE:STUBHUB REFUND LITIGATION
Matthew McMillan, Stephanie Wood, Michelle Kopfmann, Nina Dobner and Jason Alcaraz |
Last Minute Transaction, Inc. and StubHub, Inc. |
IN RE:STUBHUB REFUND LITIGATION |
4:2020md02951 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 39 MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/22/2021. Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2021 and Telephonic Further Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2021 02:00 PM. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.