Hill v. CEO of Union Supply Group et al
Nathan Hill |
CEO of Union Supply Group, CEO of Union Supply Company and CEO of Union Supply Group, Inc. |
4:2021cv00104 |
January 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC CHC |
Jon S Tigar |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nathan Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nathan Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CEO of Union Supply Company, CEO of Union Supply Group, CEO of Union Supply Group, Inc.. Filed by Nathan Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.