Jacobs v. California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration
Plaintiff: Willette D. Jacobs and Willette D Jacobs
Defendant: California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration
Case Number: 4:2021cv00350
Filed: January 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Joseph C Spero
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Willette D Jacobs. (Jacobs, Willette) (Filed on 3/12/2021)
March 12, 2021 Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration. (Daily, Kristin) (Filed on 3/12/2021)
March 4, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Willette D Jacobs. California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration served on 2/14/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2021)
February 11, 2021 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2021)
January 29, 2021 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/27/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/4/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 1/29/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 29, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 28, 2021 Filing 7 Remark: Mailed case docket with the Electronic Filing Error filed to pro se plaintiff (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2021)
January 28, 2021 #Electronic filing error. The Clerk does not prepare proposed summons. Blank forms are available on the Courts web page: www.cand.uscourts.gov. Please mail your summons to the Di strict Court, Attn: Clerks Office, 16th Floor. Re: #6 Notice (Other) filed by Willette D. Jacobs (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2021)
January 26, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of summons by Willette D. Jacobs (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2021)
January 26, 2021 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Willette D. Jacobs. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2021)
January 26, 2021 Filing 4 Corrected Civil Cover Sheet by Willette D. Jacobs. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2021) Modified on 1/28/2021 (arkS, COURT STAFF).
January 26, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of correction of Complaint by Willette D. Jacobs re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2021) Modified on 1/28/2021 (arkS, COURT STAFF).
January 13, 2021 Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration (Filing fee $ 402 Paid #34611152526.). Filed byWillette D. Jacobs. Consent/Declination due by 1/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope, #5 Filing Fee Receipt)(arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacobs v. California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Public Employee Retirement System Board of Administration
Represented By: Kristin Daily
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willette D. Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willette D Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?