Mathews v. O'Malley
Thomas Mathews |
Kevin O'Malley |
4:2021cv02216 |
March 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan van Keulen |
Jon S Tigar |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER VACATING HEARING re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Thomas Mathews. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 21, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 14 AMENDED Civil Cover Sheet by Thomas Mathews. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION. Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Remand . Motion Hearing set for 5/27/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, - To be determined before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 4/15/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9 ORDER re (1) Deadline for Parties to Consent/Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; (2) Defendant's #3 #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and (3) Plaintiff's #7 Motion for an Order Advancing Hearing Date on Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 4/6/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Thomas Mathews re #6 MOTION to Remand , #7 Ex Parte Application re #6 MOTION to Remand (Trinh, David) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 7 Ex Parte Application re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Thomas Mathews. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas Mathew in Support of Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Motion for Order Remanding Removed Action to State Court, #2 Exhibit 1-4, #3 Proposed Order)(Trinh, David) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand filed by Thomas Mathews. Motion Hearing set for 5/11/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 4/19/2021. Replies due by 4/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas Mathew in Support of Motion for Order Remanding Removed Action to State Court, #2 Exhibit 1-4)(Trinh, David) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Short Form filed by Kevin O'Malley. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Long Form filed by Kevin O'Malley. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Unlawful Detainer) from California State Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Their case number is 20CV370541. (IFPP). Filed by Kevin O'Malley. Consent/Declination due by 4/13/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) Modified on 3/30/2021 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Notice of Removal against Thomas Mathews (). Filed byKevin O'Malley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mathews v. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thomas Mathews | |
Represented By: | David Anh Vu Le Trinh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kevin O'Malley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.