Oyster Optics, LLC v. Ciena Corporation
Plaintiff: Oyster Optics, LLC
Defendant: Ciena Corporation
Case Number: 4:2021cv02241
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S White
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ciena Corporation identifying Other Affiliate Blackrock, Inc. for Ciena Corporation. (Jacobs, Blair) (Filed on 5/26/2021)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ciena Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 7/2/2021 09:00 AM before Judge Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 6/9/2021. Replies due by 6/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of B. Jacobs ISO Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1-5 to Decl. of B. Jacobs ISO Motion to Dismiss, #3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Blair) (Filed on 5/26/2021)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/11/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2021)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oyster Optics, LLC.. (Kroeger, Paul) (Filed on 5/11/2021)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2021)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ciena Corporation.. (Jacobs, Blair) (Filed on 5/11/2021)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 5/21/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2021)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #16 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Complaint, to Extend Time filed by Ciena Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Blair) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to John Holley. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Christina Ondrick. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Blair Jacobs. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. by 5/4/2021 Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of John S. Holley ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15861337.) filed by Ciena Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Stockstill, Raymond) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Christina A. Ondrick ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15861315.) filed by Ciena Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Stockstill, Raymond) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Blair M. Jacobs ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15861295.) filed by Ciena Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Stockstill, Raymond) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The correct event is SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED under the Initial Pleadings and Service/Service of Process category. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #8 Affidavit of Service filed by Oyster Optics, LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2021)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Ciena Corporation served on on April 5, 2021, answer due 4/26/21, filed by Oyster Optics, LLC. (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 4/12/2021) Modified on 4/13/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF).
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Ciena Corporation. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2021)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/21/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2021 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2021)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/15/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2021)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety as a MOTION in the earliest case number 4:17-CV-05920-JSW. See also Civil Local Rules 3-12 Related Cases. Re: #3 Notice (Other) filed by Oyster Optics, LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2021)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect document filed, please refile a Notice of Pendency of Patent. Re: #3 Notice (Other) filed by Oyster Optics, LLC (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Fil ed on 3/31/2021)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Oyster Optics, LLC re #1 Complaint, (Kroeger, Paul) (Filed on 3/30/2021)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE by Oyster Optics, LLC re #1 Complaint, Notice of Related Cases (Kroeger, Paul) (Filed on 3/30/2021)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding (cc: form mailed to register). (Kroeger, Paul) (Filed on 3/30/2021)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ciena Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15771933.). Filed byOyster Optics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons)(Kroeger, Paul) (Filed on 3/30/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oyster Optics, LLC v. Ciena Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oyster Optics, LLC
Represented By: Paul Anthony Kroeger
Represented By: Marc Aaron Fenster
Represented By: Reza Mirzaie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ciena Corporation
Represented By: Christina Ann Ondrick
Represented By: John Stewart Holley
Represented By: Blair M Jacobs
Represented By: Raymond Winters Stockstill, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?