Spitters v. Briggs
Thomas Heaton Spitters |
Heather Marie Briggs and Psynergy |
4:2021cv03060 |
April 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Kandis A Westmore |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response (Amended IFP) due by 7/8/2021. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/24/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Case Management Statement due by 7/20/2021 and Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/27/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Telephonic Only. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 6/23/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Thomas Heaton Spitters. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2021) |
Filing 6 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/22/2021. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/7/2021. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore Denying #3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amended Pleadings due by 6/1/2021.(amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Heaton Spitters. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/20/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/27/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 NO PROCESS- COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Heather Marie Briggs. Filed by Thomas Heaton Spitters. Consent/Declination due by 5/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021) Modified on 4/29/2021 (anjS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.