Whitaker v. Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC
| Brian Whitaker |
| Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC |
| 4:2021cv03624 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jeffrey S White |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint byGo Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL)(Picariello, Salvatore) (Filed on 6/22/2021) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Brian Whitaker re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15965451.). Filed byBrian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 5/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whitaker v. Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lockhart Seabock |
| Represented By: | Dennis Jay Price, II |
| Represented By: | Prathima Reddy Price |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Go Fish Poke Bar 3 LLC | |
| Represented By: | Salvatore Picariello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
