Bonilla v. Lloyd
| 4:2021cv03805 |
| May 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/28/2021. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/28/2021. ***Civil Case Terminated. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Steven Wayne Bonilla. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Default; No Process, by Steven Wayne Bonilla. (Filing Fee: NOT PAID). (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2021) Modified on 5/25/2021 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bonilla v. Lloyd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
