Turner v. Bank of America Corp. et al
Stephen Turner |
California Franchise Tax Board and Bank of America Corp. |
4:2021cv04071 |
May 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
Banks and Banking |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS by Stephen Turner (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2021 01:30 PM. (Attachments: #1 KAW - Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges)(jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stephen Turner. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT; No Process, against Bank of America Corp., California Franchise Tax Board. Filed by Stephen Turner. (Filing Fee: NOT PAID; IFPP). Consent/Declination due by 6/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) Modified on 5/28/2021 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.