Nair v. Kelly Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Indu Nair
Defendant: Kelly Services, Inc. and Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv04602
Filed: June 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #7 Stipulation to Continue Deadline for Initial Disclosures.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES filed by Novo Nordisk, Inc., Kelly Services, Inc. and Indu Nair. (Gehrke, Michele) (Filed on 7/14/2021) Modified on 7/15/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
June 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Edward Hillier on Behalf of Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hillier, Andrew) (Filed on 6/23/2021)
June 17, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Novo Nordisk, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, Remark (Shou, Ronnie) (Filed on 6/17/2021)
June 16, 2021 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/7/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/14/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
June 16, 2021 Answers filed in Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco by Novo Nordisk, Inc. and Kelly Services, Inc. on June 14, 2021. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2021) Modified on 6/16/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
June 15, 2021 #Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Ronnie Shou. The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document (dkt. #: 1 Notice of Removal, filed by Novo Nordisk, Inc.). Please update your personal profile on ECF. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2021)
June 15, 2021 #Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Nolan R. Theurer. The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document (dkt. #: 1 Notice of Removal, fil ed by Novo Nordisk, Inc.). Please update your personal profile on ECF. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2021)
June 15, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2021)
June 15, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Novo Nordisk, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. for Novo Nordisk, Inc.. (Gehrke, Michele) (Filed on 6/15/2021)
June 15, 2021 Filing 1 DEFENDANT NOVO NORDISK, INC.'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Superior Court with jury demand. Their case number is CGC-21-591203. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16079379). Filed by Novo Nordisk, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert J. Haddad, #2 Declaration of Scott Ross, #3 Declaration of Michele Haydel Gehrke, #4 Kelly Services, Inc.'s Consent to Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gehrke, Michele) (Filed on 6/15/2021) Modified on 6/16/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nair v. Kelly Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Services, Inc.
Represented By: Jamie Clayton Pollaci
Represented By: Nolan Richard Theurer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Represented By: Michele Haydel Gehrke
Represented By: Ronnie Shou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Indu Nair
Represented By: Andrew Edward Hillier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?