Lyft, Inc. v. AGIS Software Development LLC
| Lyft, Inc. |
| AGIS Software Development LLC |
| 4:2021cv04653 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #24 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Enrique Iturralde. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #22 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Peter Lambrianakos. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Alred Fabricant. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: The address on your Pro Hac Vice application does not match the address listed on the docket. Before the Court can render a decision o n the application, you need to either update your address on the docket or re-file a new application with the correct address reflected on it. [err102] Re: #23 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Vincent Rubino ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16251042.) filed by AGIS Software Development LLC (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Enrique Iturralde ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16251059.) filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Iturralde, Enrique) (Filed on 8/4/2021)
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Vincent Rubino ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16251042.) filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Rubino, Vincent) (Filed on 8/4/2021)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Peter Lambrianakos ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16251026.) filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Lambrianakos, Peter) (Filed on 8/4/2021)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Alred Fabricant ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16251010.) filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Fabricant, Alfred) (Filed on 8/4/2021)
|
|
Filing 20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lyft, Inc. Certificate of Service of Standing Order (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 19
CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for September 21, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by September 14, 2021. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:21-cv-04653-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 08/03/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 17
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 16
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by AGIS Software Development LLC.. (Wang, Benjamin) (Filed on 8/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 15
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 8/12/2021. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Minna Y. Chan (Chan, Minna) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. Service waived by AGIS Software Development LLC waiver sent on 7/28/2021, answer due 9/27/2021. (Wang, Benjamin) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin T. Wang (Wang, Benjamin) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lyft, Inc... (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to AGIS Software Development LLC. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/10/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/17/2021 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
Order. Signed 6/17/2021 by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #5 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Bethany Salpietra.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Arya Moshiri (Moshiri, Arya) (Filed on 6/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 6
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/30/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Appear in Pro Hac Vice Bethany R. Salpietra, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number 0971-16084578) filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT on the filing of an action regarding patent or trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-15 filed by Lyft, Inc. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment; Jury Trial Demanded against AGIS Software Development LLC, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-16084478). Filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 6/16/2021) Modified on 6/17/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
