David Schnur Associates, Incorporated v. Laser Light Technologies, Inc. et al
| David Schnur Associates, Incorporated |
| Laser Light Technologies, Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC and PPC Industries Inc. |
| 3:2021cv05283 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER. The motion to dismiss hearing and initial case management conference are continued to December 16, 2021. They will be held concurrently at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2021)
|
| Filing 18 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1)]) ) (Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint [F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6)]) filed byLaser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/25/2021) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1)]) ) filed byDavid Schnur Associates, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Korpus, Kymberleigh) (Filed on 8/18/2021) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1)]) filed by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. Motion Hearing set for 9/9/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 8/18/2021. Replies due by 8/25/2021. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2021) |
| Filing 15 REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss (Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [F.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1), 12(B)(6)]) ) (Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss [F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6)]) filed byLaser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 8/4/2021) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss (Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [F.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1), 12(B)(6)]) ) filed byDavid Schnur Associates, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Re Opposition to Motion to Dismiss)(Korpus, Kymberleigh) (Filed on 7/30/2021) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David Schnur Associates, Incorporated re #12 Amended Complaint [First] (Korpus, Kymberleigh) (Filed on 7/30/2021) |
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants. Filed by David Schnur Associates, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Korpus, Kymberleigh) (Filed on 7/30/2021) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss (Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [F.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1), 12(B)(6)]) filed by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. Motion Hearing set for 9/9/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 7/30/2021. Replies due by 8/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffrey L. Fillerup, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/16/2021) |
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/14/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 10/7/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/14/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 7/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2021) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2021 at 01:30 PM. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC.. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/23/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Jury Demand, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC re #1 Notice of Removal - (Notice of Interested Non-Parties) (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Laser Light Technologies, Inc., PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. (Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the City and County of San Mateo. Their case number is 21-CIV-02939, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-16158774). Filed by PPC Industries Inc., SPG Laser Light Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Fillerup, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/9/2021) Modified on 7/9/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
