Meier v. City of Brisbane et al
| Sampson Meier |
| City of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla, California Transportation Department and County of San Mateo |
| 4:2021cv05504 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant California Transportation Department (CalTrans) ONLY by Sampson Meier (Richardson, Richard) (Filed on 8/25/2021) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing: Notice is hereby given to all parties that the hearing on Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's motion to dismiss #5 has been CONTINUED to 9/30/2021 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) #5 )(dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2021) |
| Filing 13 Letter from Plaintiff SAMPSON MEIER and Defendants CITY OF BRISBANE and ABRAHAM SEVILLA . (Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 12 REPLY (re #5 Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint ) filed byCity of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla. (Nozzolino, Maria) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Maria Nozzolino (Nozzolino, Maria) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant City of Brisbane's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6)(re #5 Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint ) filed by Sampson Meier. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard L. Richardson in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant City of Brisbane's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6))(Richardson, Richard) (Filed on 8/5/2021) Modified on 8/6/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9
ORDER: According to the docket, it appears that Defendants California Transportation Department and County of San Mateo have not been served. The court cannot decide the pending motion to dismiss #5 without the consent of all parties, served and unserved. See Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503 (9th Cir. 2017). By no later than 8/12/2021, the parties shall file a joint letter indicating whether they agree to continue the hearing on the pending motion to dismiss for approximately a month in order to effect service on Defendants California Transportation Department and County of San Mateo, and once served, to give Defendants time to consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction. The case may otherwise be reassigned to a district judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/5/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla (Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 7/27/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 7/27/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sampson Meier.. (Richardson, Richard) (Filed on 7/26/2021) |
| Filing 5 Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by City of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla. Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2021 01:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 8/5/2021. Replies due by 8/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants Rule 12(B)(5)-(6), #2 Proposed Order Defendants Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint)(Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 7/22/2021) Modified on 7/23/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by City of Brisbane, Abraham Sevilla.. (Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/13/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/20/2021 01:30 PM. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/30/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Mateo County Superior Court. Their case number is 21-CIV-01039. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16188149). Filed byAbraham Sevilla, City of Brisbane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Kevin P. Allen in Support of Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 USC section 1331; Demand for Jury Trial, #3 Request for Judicial Notice in support of in Support of Defendants City of Brisbane and Abraham Sevilla's Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 USC section 1331; Demand for Jury Trial, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Allen, Kevin) (Filed on 7/16/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
