Garcia v. Chan et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Arthur Chan and Oriental Pearl Restaurant LLC |
| 4:2021cv05510 |
| July 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: The parties shall file a joint status report regarding settlement or dismissal by no later than 11/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/15/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2021)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Orlando Garcia for settlement and Request to vacate all currently set dates (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/15/2021) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orlando Garcia. Amended POS (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/2/2021) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orlando Garcia. Oriental Pearl Restaurant LLC served on 8/19/2021, answer due 9/9/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orlando Garcia. Arthur Chan served on 8/15/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Orlando Garcia.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 8/13/2021) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/17/2021. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arthur Chan, Oriental Pearl Restaurant LLC. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/2/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Orlando Garcia re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16190066.). Filed byOrlando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
