Cochran v. Internal Revenue Service
| Antonio Lamar Cochran |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 4:2021cv05627 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC AGB |
| Phyllis J Hamilton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/2/2021. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/2/2021. ***Civil Case Terminated. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S LETTER to Plaintiff that case has been transferred to the Northern District of California (Oakland). (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:21-cv-02169. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to the Northern District of California. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
| Interdistrict transfer to Northern District of California. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 7/19/2021, filed. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antonio Lamar Cochran, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Antonio Lamar Cochran, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/22/2021. (ckrus, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Antonio Lamar Cochran.(ckrus, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cochran v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Lamar Cochran | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
