Mitchell v. Atchley
| Correy Mitchell |
| Matthew Atchley |
| 4:2021cv06176 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC CHC |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge JON S. TIGAR on August 30, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge JON S. TIGAR on August 30, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Correy Mitchell.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 08/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 08/23/2021. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Correy Mitchell.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00.). Filed byCorrey Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Atchley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Correy Mitchell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Atchley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
