Flynn v. County of Contra Costa, et al
Christina Flynn |
County of Contra Costa, City Of Concord, Jason Colon, Toni Nestore and Mark Evans |
3:2021cv06996 |
September 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan Illston |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE CONVERTING HEARING TO ZOOM: Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2021 at 02:30 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 12/2/21 at 2 pm Pacific.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://w ww.cand.uscourts.gov/si General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2021 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2021 02:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to City of Concord, Jason Colon, County of Contra Costa, Mark Evans, Toni Nestore. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2021 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 01, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Susan Illston. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2021) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Powell, Robert) (Filed on 9/9/2021) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Christina Flynn (Powell, Robert) (Filed on 9/9/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16372869.). Filed byChristina Flynn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Powell, Robert) (Filed on 9/9/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.